Show that the function f is bijection

  • Thread starter Thread starter zodiacbrave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bijection Function
zodiacbrave
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
a function f, that maps from the Cartesian Product of the positive integers to the positive integers. where
f(x,y) = 2^(x - 1) * (2y - 1).

I have to show that this function is both one-to-one and onto. I started trying to prove that it is onto, showing that there exists an n such that f(n,0) = n but I am not sure where to go from here.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey zodiacbrave and welcome to the forum.

For one-to-one, one suggestion I have is to show that the inverse exists everywhere in the respective domain.

By showing that the inverse exists everywhere in the domain, you have basically shown the one-to-one property.

Even though we are only dealing with integers, if you show this property over the positive reals, then it automatically applies for the positive integers (think of it in terms of subsets).

Hint: What do we need for the derivative to be when an inverse function exists across an interval?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top