Show that this Equation Satisfies the Schrodinger Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the application of the Schrödinger Equation in quantum mechanics, specifically the equation in the form: (ħ/2m) d²Ψ(x,t)/dx² + V(x,t)Ψ(x,t) = EΨ(x,t). The user incorrectly formatted the equation and neglected to include the necessary minus sign, which is crucial for accuracy. Additionally, there was confusion regarding the need for a second derivative with respect to time (T). The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct wave function and understanding the distinction between time-dependent and time-independent forms of the Schrödinger equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger Equation
  • Familiarity with wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their application in physics
  • Basic concepts of harmonic oscillators in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the correct formulation of the time-dependent and time-independent Schrödinger equations
  • Learn about wave functions and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Study the principles of harmonic oscillators in quantum physics
  • Practice solving differential equations related to quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, wave functions, and the Schrödinger Equation. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to clarify their understanding of these fundamental concepts.

Zinggy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Show directly by using the wave function in the Schrodinger equation, that this equation satisfies the Schrödinger equation
Relevant Equations
V(x)=1/2kx^2
E=(5ħ/2)√(k/m)
α=(mk/ħ)^1/4
Ψ(x,t) =ψ (x)φ (t) = √(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*e^((-1/2)α^2x^2)[-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)
Physics Test 2.png


I apologize for the bad formatting:

To start off, I'm trying to use the Schrödinger Equation in the form: (ħ/2m) d^2Ψ(x,t)/dx^2+V(x,t)Ψ(x,t)=EΨ(x,t)

I couldn't remember if I need to also take the partial derivative with respect to T as well, but I started off with just X.

I plugged in my known values into the equation which gives me the very messy:
(ħ/2m)d^2[√(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*e^((-1/2)α^2x^2)[-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)]/dx^2 +(1/2kx^2)(√(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*e^((-1/2)α^2x^2)[-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)) = (5ħ/2)√(k/m)* √(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*e^((-1/2)α^2x^2)[-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)

This already seemed wrong to me, but I carried on and tried to take the second derivative with respect to X and got the following:

√(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*α^2 e^[-1/2(α^2 x^2)] (α^2 x^2 -1) [-2+8α^2)e^[-iEt/ħ] = d^2Ψ(x,t)/dx^2

From here I extracted common terms, giving me:

√(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)] * e^[-iEt/ħ]*e^[-1/2(α^2 x^2)] * {(ħ/2m)α^2(α^2 x^2 -1)[-2+8α^2)+1/2kx^2[-2+4α^2x^2]} = EΨ(x,t)

From this point I divided both sides by √(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)] and e^[-1/2(α^2 x^2)] giving me

e^[-iEt/ħ]* {(ħ/2m)α^2(α^2 x^2 -1)[-2+8α^2)+1/2kx^2[-2+4α^2x^2]} = E([-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)]

After this point I don't really know where to go. I don't understand how to isolate and solve for either ψ(x) or φ (t), I also don't know if I should've also taken the second derivative with respect to T as well.
I appreciate any time and Input. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by looking up the Schrödinger equation. The version you're using isn't correct (or you made the same typo multiple times). Also, note that the function you're working with is a function of ##x## and ##t##.

A comment on terminology... You're not trying to show that an equation satisfies the Schrödinger equation; you're trying to show that a wave function satisfies the Schrödinger equation.
 
I may have not gotten my formatting correct, this is what I'm using as my Schrödinger equation
241893

I found this equation in my Harmonic Oscillator section in my textbook, is this wrong?
 
Here's what you said in your original post:
Zinggy said:
(ħ/2m) d^2Ψ(x,t)/dx^2+V(x,t)Ψ(x,t)=EΨ(x,t)
You were missing the minus sign in front and you didn't square ##\hbar##. The minus sign makes a big difference.

Note that in the equation you cited in post #3, the function ##u## is a function of only ##x## whereas you're given a function ##\Psi## of ##x## and ##t##, so that's not the equation you want to use.
 
Ah yes, those were just typos, sorry I didn't do a great job of representing my equations.. Would the question use an equation like this?
241896
 
Essentially, yes, though that's an intermediate step.

You shouldn't have to be guessing here. Your book should tell you what the time-dependent and time-independent forms of the Schrödinger equation are.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
783
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
973
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K