Show that this Equation Satisfies the Schrodinger Equation

Zinggy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Show directly by using the wave function in the Schrodinger equation, that this equation satisfies the Schrödinger equation
Relevant Equations
V(x)=1/2kx^2
E=(5ħ/2)√(k/m)
α=(mk/ħ)^1/4
Ψ(x,t) =ψ (x)φ (t) = √(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*e^((-1/2)α^2x^2)[-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)
Physics Test 2.png


I apologize for the bad formatting:

To start off, I'm trying to use the Schrodinger Equation in the form: (ħ/2m) d^2Ψ(x,t)/dx^2+V(x,t)Ψ(x,t)=EΨ(x,t)

I couldn't remember if I need to also take the partial derivative with respect to T as well, but I started off with just X.

I plugged in my known values into the equation which gives me the very messy:
(ħ/2m)d^2[√(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*e^((-1/2)α^2x^2)[-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)]/dx^2 +(1/2kx^2)(√(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*e^((-1/2)α^2x^2)[-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)) = (5ħ/2)√(k/m)* √(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*e^((-1/2)α^2x^2)[-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)

This already seemed wrong to me, but I carried on and tried to take the second derivative with respect to X and got the following:

√(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)]*α^2 e^[-1/2(α^2 x^2)] (α^2 x^2 -1) [-2+8α^2)e^[-iEt/ħ] = d^2Ψ(x,t)/dx^2

From here I extracted common terms, giving me:

√(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)] * e^[-iEt/ħ]*e^[-1/2(α^2 x^2)] * {(ħ/2m)α^2(α^2 x^2 -1)[-2+8α^2)+1/2kx^2[-2+4α^2x^2]} = EΨ(x,t)

From this point I divided both sides by √(α)/[2√(2π^1/4)] and e^[-1/2(α^2 x^2)] giving me

e^[-iEt/ħ]* {(ħ/2m)α^2(α^2 x^2 -1)[-2+8α^2)+1/2kx^2[-2+4α^2x^2]} = E([-2+α^2 x^2]e^(-iEt/ħ)]

After this point I don't really know where to go. I don't understand how to isolate and solve for either ψ(x) or φ (t), I also don't know if I should've also taken the second derivative with respect to T as well.
I appreciate any time and Input. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by looking up the Schrödinger equation. The version you're using isn't correct (or you made the same typo multiple times). Also, note that the function you're working with is a function of ##x## and ##t##.

A comment on terminology... You're not trying to show that an equation satisfies the Schrödinger equation; you're trying to show that a wave function satisfies the Schrödinger equation.
 
I may have not gotten my formatting correct, this is what I'm using as my Schrodinger equation
241893

I found this equation in my Harmonic Oscillator section in my textbook, is this wrong?
 
Here's what you said in your original post:
Zinggy said:
(ħ/2m) d^2Ψ(x,t)/dx^2+V(x,t)Ψ(x,t)=EΨ(x,t)
You were missing the minus sign in front and you didn't square ##\hbar##. The minus sign makes a big difference.

Note that in the equation you cited in post #3, the function ##u## is a function of only ##x## whereas you're given a function ##\Psi## of ##x## and ##t##, so that's not the equation you want to use.
 
Ah yes, those were just typos, sorry I didn't do a great job of representing my equations.. Would the question use an equation like this?
241896
 
Essentially, yes, though that's an intermediate step.

You shouldn't have to be guessing here. Your book should tell you what the time-dependent and time-independent forms of the Schrödinger equation are.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top