Showing a localization is a principal ideal domain (non-trivial problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ttzhou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain
ttzhou
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let R be an integral domain. Say a prime p \in R is small if a\in\bigcap\limits _{n=1}^{\infty}\left\langle p^{n}\right\rangle = \left\langle 0\right\rangle

Show that if p is a small prime and D = R \setminus \left\langle p\right\rangle then R_D is a principal ideal domain.

Homework Equations



Some basic facts... ED implies PID, field implies PID, PID implies UFD. Localization is a PID if R is a PID, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using First Isomorphism Theorem to show R_D is a field; I quickly shot this down with a counterexample by taking R to be the integers, and since every prime is small in the integers, taking p = 2 shows that 2/3 in the localization has no inverse.

The only other approach I can think of that can be used when I know squat about the ring is to show it is an ED. But I can't find a valid Euclidean function.

Any ideas? I don't want solutions, obviously... just a tiny hint to push me in a promising direction.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, can you show that an element x that is not invertible in R_D can be written as py.

In general, can you show that if x is not invertible, then it can be written as p^ny with y invertible.
 
Thank you for the hint! Will see where it takes me.
 
I think I have a proof involving finite descent; I eventually show that any ideal I is either equal to the ideal generated by some power of p (with 1 in the denominator), or we reach the point where the ideal generated by p is contained in I. Since I was able to show any proper ideal must be contained in (p), I am done... That is, any ideal is of the form (p^n) or the ring itself.

Sry for the lack of LaTex, I'm typing on a tablet.

Was there a more elegant approach?
 
That's indeed what I had in mind.
 
Thanks very much, your hint was very concise and well chosen. All the best.
 
I am still confused. Could you please explain it in steps?
 
msg me if you want some hints
 
Last edited by a moderator:
or micromass for that matter, he was the architect
 
  • #10
arya1234 said:
I am still confused. Could you please explain it in steps?

You will have to show us what you tried. Did you prove my post #2?
 
Back
Top