Showing Openness of U: Let X be a Metric Space & p in X with r>0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set U = {x∈X|d(x,p)>r} is open in a metric space X, where p is a point in X and r is a positive real number. The key argument is that for U to be open, every point x in U must be an interior point, which requires finding an appropriate ε > 0 such that the open ball B(x, ε) is a subset of U. The participants discuss using the triangle inequality to establish the relationship between distances, ultimately concluding that ε must be chosen correctly to ensure d(y, p) > r for all y in B(x, ε).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of open sets in topology
  • Knowledge of the triangle inequality in metric spaces
  • Ability to work with open balls and interior points
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition of open sets in metric spaces
  • Learn about the properties of open balls and their role in topology
  • Explore the triangle inequality and its applications in metric spaces
  • Investigate examples of open sets in various metric spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone studying metric spaces who seeks to understand the concept of openness in a rigorous context.

golriz
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
" Let X be a metric space and p be a point in X and be a positive real number. Use the definition of openness to show that the set U(subset of X) given by:
U = {x∈X|d(x,p)>r} is open. "

I have tried:
U is open if every point of U be an interior point of U. x is an interior point of U if there is an open ball B(x, r) is a subset of U. Let y belongs to B(x, r) then d(x, y)< r, and p doesn’t belong to B(x, r) since d(p, x) > r. If we can show that d(y, p) > r (y is in X) then since y is a arbitrary point of B(x, r) it means that the open ball is a subset of U.
But I don’t know how to show d(y, p) > r ?
Please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you need to do is take an arbitrary x in U. This x will have as property that d(x,p)>r.

Now you need to find an \varepsilon&gt;0 suitably such that

B(x,\varepsilon)\subseteq U

So for each y with d(x,y)&lt;\varepsilon must hold that d(y,p)>r.

Now, draw a picture first. What must \varepsilon be??
 
d(x, p) + d(p, y)> d(x, y)
d(x, y)< 2r < ε
ε = 2r
Is it correct?
 
No, and I don't see what you did actually...
 
I use triangle inequality, so:

d(x, p) + d(p, y)> d(x, y)
 
What you know is that d(x,y)&lt;\varepsilon. What you must prove is that d(y,p)>r. I don't see how your argument solves that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K