Showing Openness of U: Let X be a Metric Space & p in X with r>0

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of openness in metric spaces, specifically examining the set U defined as U = {x∈X|d(x,p)>r}, where X is a metric space, p is a point in X, and r is a positive real number. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that U is an open set using the definition of openness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to show that every point in U is an interior point by considering open balls around points in U. They question how to establish that d(y, p) > r for points y within these balls.
  • Some participants suggest finding a suitable ε > 0 such that the open ball B(x, ε) is contained in U, prompting a discussion on the relationship between distances and the triangle inequality.
  • There is a debate over the correctness of a proposed ε value and the application of the triangle inequality in this context.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of using the definition of openness in metric spaces and are grappling with the implications of distance properties in their arguments. There is a focus on ensuring that the chosen ε effectively demonstrates the required conditions for openness.

golriz
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
" Let X be a metric space and p be a point in X and be a positive real number. Use the definition of openness to show that the set U(subset of X) given by:
U = {x∈X|d(x,p)>r} is open. "

I have tried:
U is open if every point of U be an interior point of U. x is an interior point of U if there is an open ball B(x, r) is a subset of U. Let y belongs to B(x, r) then d(x, y)< r, and p doesn’t belong to B(x, r) since d(p, x) > r. If we can show that d(y, p) > r (y is in X) then since y is a arbitrary point of B(x, r) it means that the open ball is a subset of U.
But I don’t know how to show d(y, p) > r ?
Please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you need to do is take an arbitrary x in U. This x will have as property that d(x,p)>r.

Now you need to find an \varepsilon&gt;0 suitably such that

B(x,\varepsilon)\subseteq U

So for each y with d(x,y)&lt;\varepsilon must hold that d(y,p)>r.

Now, draw a picture first. What must \varepsilon be??
 
d(x, p) + d(p, y)> d(x, y)
d(x, y)< 2r < ε
ε = 2r
Is it correct?
 
No, and I don't see what you did actually...
 
I use triangle inequality, so:

d(x, p) + d(p, y)> d(x, y)
 
What you know is that d(x,y)&lt;\varepsilon. What you must prove is that d(y,p)>r. I don't see how your argument solves that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K