Shunt resistor right application?

AI Thread Summary
A 400A (125VDC) charger feeds a battery bank and critical DC panels, but reconnecting the battery after a load test may cause a surge of approximately 350A, risking a voltage drop in the panels. A properly sized shunt resistor, referred to as a current limiting resistor, can mitigate this surge by being placed between the disconnect switch and the panels. It should be sized to account for the I^2R loss and removed from the circuit after the surge. An inductor was considered for surge limiting but deemed ineffective due to the slow response time of the battery. Implementing the current limiting resistor is essential to protect the critical loads on the panels.
whodatnation
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a 400A (125VDC) charger that feeds a battery bank and a few DC panels (critical). This poor design has the panels being fed from the high side of a 600A breaker that is between the charger and battery bank. I need to take the battery off line for a load test but the problem I'm going to have is when I reconnect the battery to the charger I will have a current surge coming from the 400A charger to the unenergized battery bank (approx. 350A). This will most probably cause a voltage drop in the DC panels which I CANNOT have (critical loads on panels). Will a proplerly sized shunt resistor between the disconnect switch and panels work for this situation?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes. I would not call it a shunt, I would call it a current limiting resistor. It needs to be sized for the ##I^2R## loss. Then it should be shorted once the surge has passed to remove it from the circuit.

I was thinking about an inductor for surge limiting, but no that would not work because the battery would be too slow to respond, making the surge last for seconds.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top