Sig fig or decimal places for variance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZedCar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of variance for the set of numbers: 34.1, 35.6, 35.8, 34.3, 32.9, and 33.7, with a calculated variance of 0.208. Participants debate whether to express the variance in three significant figures or as 0.2, matching the decimal places of the original numbers. The consensus leans towards using 0.208, as it reflects the precision of the calculated variance. A reference link was provided to support this conclusion. Ultimately, quoting the variance as 0.208 is deemed more appropriate.
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Calculate variance of 34.1, 35.6, 35.8, 34.3, 32.9, 33.7


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



A set of numbers: 34.1, 35.6, 35.8, 34.3, 32.9, 33.7

I have calculated the variance to be = 0.208

Would it be better to quote to three sig fig as I have done. This being the number of sig fig of the numbers in the set.

Or should I quote it as 0.2, this being the same number of decimal places of the numbers in the set.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
here's a reference to help:

http://www.usca.edu/chemistry/genchem/sigfig2.htm

from it I'd conclude that 0.208 is the better answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks very much for the link jedishrfu
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top