Sign of acceleration in the pulley-type question

  • Thread starter Thread starter tsw99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Sign
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the pulley-type question, two equations were derived for the acceleration of a system involving two objects connected by a string over a pulley. The first equation incorrectly assumed the acceleration direction for both objects, leading to a flawed result. The correct approach recognizes that the inextensibility of the string requires consistent displacement directions for both objects, which was not maintained in the first setup. Newton's third law indicates that the forces acting on the two objects must have opposite signs, confirming the error in the initial calculations. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of correctly defining acceleration directions to avoid contradictions in the system's behavior.
tsw99
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



suppose an object A is placed on a horizontal frictionless table, and connected with a light inextensible string with a light, fixed pulley at the edge, and object B is only pulled by the vertical string that connected to a pulley.

I tried to set the acceleration up and right to be positive,
then two equations:
T-m_{A}a=0
T-m_{B}g=m_{B}a
so the acceleration of the system is
a=\frac{m_{B}g}{m_{A}-m{B}}

however if I set the acceleration down (and right) to be positive, then
T-m_{A}a=0
m_{B}g-T=m_{B}a
the acceleration becomes
a=\frac{m_{B}g}{m_{A}+m{B}}

they are not off by a minus sign. I can't think of a satisfactory explanation for this, and which one is correct? thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll tell you which one is wrong, the first one, and now I want you to tell me why it is wrong.
 
Mindscrape said:
I'll tell you which one is wrong, the first one, and now I want you to tell me why it is wrong.

I think I see the reason.
since the string is inextensible, so the direction of displacement must be set in the second way, in order to preserve the length of the string

please tell me if I am right or wrong. thanks
 
Right, I think you have, or at least are on to, the right idea. In your first set up you made the acceleration go to the right for the top block and up for the second block. That would mean the two blocks are going to meet each other, which intuitively isn't at all what happens. From physics laws, we know from Newton's 3rd law the the direction of force on the first object is opposite to the direction of force on the second object, so your tensions cannot have the same sign. Mathematically, we know that you'd create a discontinuity if m_A=m_B, and we should know that is definitely wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top