Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

News Sign of the times: No more nudes in Playboy magazine

  1. Oct 13, 2015 #1


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    In March, Playboy magazine will roll out a new design which lacks the fully-nude photos that have been a signature feature since its beginning in 1953. Hef himself agreed to the change.

    Nudes Are Old News at Playboy (New York Times)
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 13, 2015 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    I can't see that happening. :oldtongue:
  4. Oct 13, 2015 #3


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Hugh hefner wants shooting, i am not a dirty old man wearing a mackintosh i am an appreciator of art, come to think of it i hardly ever buy this type of magazine so why should i worry:wink:
  5. Oct 24, 2015 #4
    All of the nudes are now on cable television.
  6. Oct 24, 2015 #5


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I believe the rationale is that
    a] no way it can compete with what you can find on the Interwebz, and
    b] removing the element of nudity opens up a huge market, here (it can be put on newsstands), but more importantly, abroad. Many countries forbid magazine nudity outright. Playboy simply cannot be distributed there with nudity. This change will allow it into many countries around the world who could not otherwise sell it.
  7. Oct 25, 2015 #6
    Right. Playboy gets its money via licensing the logo, largely in China. The magazine just hangs around to lend the logo credibility.
  8. Oct 25, 2015 #7


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Interesting. When I was in China I noticed a lot of women wear shoes, shirts, purses, etc. with the Playboy logo on it. I wasn't sure if Playboy went into the clothing industry, but I guess this explains it.
  9. Nov 3, 2015 #8


    User Avatar
    Education Advisor

    But then by doing this, Playboy will be competing with the likes of Maxim and other similar magazines of that ilk both in newsstands and in foreign markets. But given that Playboy is still primarily associated with open expression of sexuality in a way that Maxim and other magazines don't quite embrace, it does make me wonder about the future of the magazine. The Playboy corporation itself may survive through the licensing of its logo and through the Playboy channel and online web businesses, however.

    At any rate, I consider Playboy itself to be largely obsolete as a magazine. The whole idea of Playboy was to embrace the sexual revolution, which has largely run its course in society. With the widespread availability of porn online, and where swinging, open relationships, friends-with-benefits arrangements, and casual hookups all considered options for the current generation (if not fully mainstream), is there really even a reason for Playboy to exist?
  10. Nov 26, 2015 #9
    I bet there is also an economics standpoint of not having to pay celebrities to show their "talent." I don't know anyone who buys nudie magazines when you can stream it for free, so merch income is pretty much carrying the burden, I imagine.
  11. Nov 26, 2015 #10
    Fun story, a friend of mine sometimes winds up in the newspaper shop after a night out. (No really, a friend. No shop on my way home)
    Depending on his level of intoxication he takes home a nudie magazine. So if the shops would stay open until 2-3 am they'd see a rise in sales I would bet.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook