Signal-Noise Ratio: Decibels & Resolving Signals

AI Thread Summary
A signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 20 dB is considered excellent for resolving signals, particularly in applications like integrated circuits that read magnetic fields. This ratio indicates a 100:1 power difference between signal and noise, allowing for clear signal detection. While the lowest detectable signal occurs at 0 dB, methods exist to observe signals below this threshold, as seen in GPS technology. The discussion emphasizes the importance of context in evaluating SNR, as different systems may have varying requirements. Overall, achieving an SNR of 20 dB is advantageous for effective signal resolution.
dmorris619
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I am trying to get an understanding of what a good signal to noise ratio in terms of decibels. My SNR is roughly 20 dB, and am concerned about being able to resolve the signal from this.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You need to provide a context--what is your system, application, apparatus, etc.--to get a useful answer. In general, however, 20 dB (a 100:1 ratio of signal power to noise power) could be considered excellent, even luxurious. (Consider that GPS receivers operate on a signal that is below the thermal noise floor).
 
Its for an integrated circuit that reads the magnetic field. I am calculating the noise generated by the device which is essentially white noise.
 
Information can very easily be resolved from a signal with SNR of 20dB and rarely does one have such luck to work with such signals.

The lowest detectable signal is often said to be when the signal power is equal to the noise power or the SNR is 0dB. There are of course methods of observing a signal will less than 0dB such as those used in GPS receivers like mentioned above.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top