Significant Figures: How to Properly Round Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter qwsdcnjkio
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the proper rounding of numbers using significant figures, specifically the sum of 37.26972, 25.43, 0.837, 101.22, and 3.1, which totals 167.85672. The correct rounding to one decimal place is debated, with one source suggesting it should be rounded down to 167.8, while another clarifies that it should round up to 167.9 due to the rounding rules for significant figures. The key rule discussed states that if the digit to be dropped is 5 and there are non-zero digits following it, the last remaining digit should be increased by one. This clarification resolves the confusion regarding the rounding process. Understanding these rules is essential for accurate calculations in scientific contexts.
qwsdcnjkio
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was reading the Intro to Physics PDF file on this forum about significant figures/digits.

Basically the example used is this; add these numbers up and round off to the correct significant figures/digits:

37.26972+25.43+0.837+101.22+3.1=167.85672=167.9(1 decimal place)

I understand why the answer must be given to 1 decimal place, however, according another web site, http://www.chem.sc.edu/faculty/morgan/resources/sigfigs/sigfigs6.html,
167.85672 should be rounded down to 167.8 (1 d.p.).

Does anyone know who if anyone is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
qwsdcnjkio said:
I understand why the answer must be given to 1 decimal place, however, according another web site, http://www.chem.sc.edu/faculty/morgan/resources/sigfigs/sigfigs6.html,
167.85672 should be rounded down to 167.8 (1 d.p.).

Does anyone know who if anyone is correct?
You must be misreading that link. It clearly says:
(3) If the digit to be dropped is 5, and if any digit following it is not zero, the last remaining digit is increased by one. For example,

12.51 is rounded to 13.​
In the example you gave (167.85672 rounded to 1 decimal), the digit you are dropping is 5 and fits this rule, so the last remaining digit (8) must be rounded up to 9.
 
i see now, don't think i read (3) properly as you said, thanks for lcearing that up :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
212
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
15K
Back
Top