Silly math problem on precipitation

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoshi6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Precipitation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a math problem involving precipitation measurements and volume calculations for the City of Guelph. The original poster records 0.4 inches of rain, converting it to 1.016 cm, and attempts to calculate the total volume of water over the city's area of 86 km². They express confusion about unit conversions and calculations, particularly when comparing this volume to the average flow of the Speed River, which is 5.8 m³ per second. Other participants emphasize the importance of proper unit conversions and point out errors in the calculations. Ultimately, the poster concludes that the volume of water over Guelph is greater than that of the Speed River, but seeks verification of their work.
yoshi6
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. I have this simple math problem that is worth 5 marks and I am not sure if it is right. Anyway it is on precipitation, here it is!

Record the amount of water (in centimetres) the tipping bucket rain gauge received. Calculate the total volume of water this would equal if this amount fell over the City of Guelph (area 86km squared). Is this volume greater or less than the average volume of water which flows through the city in the Spped River during a 24 hour period (average flow rate = 5.8mcubed per second).

Okay so first I am having trouble calculating the volume, I don't know why:

my recordings are: the amount of water (in centimetres) is four tenths of an inch--coverted equals 1.01600cm.

so, can I calculate this by multiplying 1.01600 x 86km

THANKS!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pleaseeeee help!
 
I noticed that you didn't bother with the units in your calculation...
 
okay so here is my attempt...
convert---> 1.01600 to meters and 86 km squared to meters

and then... 0.01016 x 9270 x 9270 = 873, 078.3m^2 now to compare

24 hours in seconds/ 5.8m^2 per second= 86400/ 33.64=2568.37

So, therefore, the volume of water over Guelph city is greater than that of speed river.
 
can someone please be so kind and check this for me? Thanks!
 
yoshi6 said:
okay so here is my attempt...
convert---> 1.01600 to meters and 86 km squared to meters

and then... 0.01016 x 9270 x 9270 = 873, 078.3m^2 now to compare

24 hours in seconds/ 5.8m^2 per second= 86400/ 33.64=2568.37

So, therefore, the volume of water over Guelph city is greater than that of speed river.

You really need to focus on you units. This, for example, makes no sense.

24 hours in seconds/ 5.8m^2 per second= 86400/ 33.64=2568.37
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top