Similar to calculating distance of photon traveling in space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adc22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving bullets fired through a hole, with a focus on calculating the distance needed to detect a specific spread in the beam. The original poster expresses confusion about missing information and seeks guidance on how to approach the problem, considering concepts like Hubble's law and matter waves. Clarification is provided that the 1.77 cm likely refers to the distance between bullets, and the 1.99 mm is the hole's depth. Ultimately, the poster resolves the issue by applying principles of single-slit diffraction to determine the necessary distance to observe the beam's spread. The conversation highlights the challenges of understanding complex physics concepts and the importance of clear problem statements.
adc22
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Bullets of mass 1.53 gm are fired in parallel paths at speeds of 244.4 m/s through a hole 1.99 mm. How far from the hole must you be to detect a 1.77 cm in the beam of bullets

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I feel as though some crucial information is missing (like a word between "1.77 cm" and "in the beam". Am I missing something here? Can someone just give me a clue on where exactly to start? My professor is not the best at explaining the concept behind the problem sets. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OP here.

So I have tried using Hubble's law, but is this the right approach? Should I be thinking about matter waves?
 
I imagine that 1.77 cm is the distance between bullets. Is this about resolving some spatial feature at a distance?

Presumably the 1.99 mm is the depth of the hole?

Are you doing something about the uncertainty principle by any chance?
 
I figured out the problem. I approached like a single-slit diffraction problem, and after calculating the wavelength of the bullets, calculated the distance to the "screen" to see half of the spread in the beam.

Thanks though. I sort of wish it had been a universe expansion problem!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top