Simple Circuits: Calculating Power in a Complex Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter zaddyzad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the power delivered to resistor R1 in a complex circuit. The user initially attempts to find the equivalent resistance and calculates a current of 36.67 Amps, resulting in a power of 2688 watts. However, it is noted that the circuit cannot be simplified using series and parallel methods alone; instead, Kirchhoff's Laws should be applied for a complete analysis. The importance of correctly identifying the configuration of resistors is emphasized to avoid calculation errors. Accurate application of these principles is crucial for determining the correct power dissipation in the circuit.
zaddyzad
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imgur.com/PJVmXEc

Calculate the power delivered to (or dissipated by) R1

Homework Equations



V=IR
P=I^2R

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to calculate the equivalence resistance by doing... 2+(2^-1+4^-1+4^-1)^-1 = and I get 3.

I later calculate a current of 36.67Amps, and a power of 2688 watts. What did I do wrong.

then I tr
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I also tried... 60-2I2-4I2=0, 60-2I1-4I3=0, 110 -2I4-2I1=0
 
zaddyzad said:

Homework Statement



http://imgur.com/PJVmXEc

Calculate the power delivered to (or dissipated by) R1

Homework Equations



V=IR
P=I^2R

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to calculate the equivalence resistance by doing... 2+(2^-1+4^-1+4^-1)^-1 = and I get 3.

I later calculate a current of 36.67Amps, and a power of 2688 watts. What did I do wrong.

then I tr

attachment.php?attachmentid=66801&stc=1&d=1392865179.png


(Posting the image makes it more likely that someone will reply to your question.)


This cannot be analyzed as a parallel/series circuit. That sort of method can only be used to replace R2 & R3 by considering them to be in parallel (for this circuit.)

Use Kirchhoff's Laws for the complete analysis.
 

Attachments

  • PJVmXEc.png
    PJVmXEc.png
    4.7 KB · Views: 782
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top