Simple collision between two moving bodies.

  • Thread starter Thread starter whammer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies Collision
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the collision dynamics between a truck and a car moving at the same velocity. Each vehicle exerts a force on the other, adhering to Newton's third law, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The confusion arises from the perception of forces acting on each vehicle, with one participant questioning whether to treat the collision as if the vehicles were slamming into a stationary wall. The consensus clarifies that the forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, emphasizing that the reaction forces act on the other body rather than on itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion, particularly Newton's third law.
  • Basic knowledge of force interactions in physics.
  • Familiarity with one-dimensional motion concepts.
  • Ability to analyze collision scenarios in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of momentum conservation in collisions.
  • Learn about elastic and inelastic collisions and their characteristics.
  • Explore the mathematical modeling of collisions using equations of motion.
  • Investigate real-world applications of collision physics in automotive safety design.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, automotive engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of collisions and force interactions in moving bodies.

whammer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Truck and car collide in one dimension. Assume same velocity. I see this as having 4 forces, two on each body.

Each vehicle exerts its own force on the other. The truck exerts a force on car and vice versa. In addition, the truck's exertion of force on the car is reacted to via Newton's third law. and the car's exertion of force on the truck is reacted to via Newton's third law.

Taking the car individually, it has the force from the truck acting on it. Plus it has the reaction force from having acted upon the truck.

I suspect that my logic is flawed but I cannot see why. Should I treat each body's forces as though it slammed into a wall? You slam into the wall, exerting a force on it, whereupon the wall returns the favour. It just seems different to me. The vehicle has velocity whereas a wall does not.

Confused
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi whammer, welcome to PF.

When two bodies A and B interact, moving or not moving, A exerts a force FAB to B, and B exerts the force FBA to A. The forces are of equal magnitude and opposite direction. So there is only one force acting on a body. The reaction force a body exerts acts on the other body, not on itself.

ehild
whammer said:
Truck and car collide in one dimension. Assume same velocity. I see this as having 4 forces, two on each body.

Each vehicle exerts its own force on the other. The truck exerts a force on car and vice versa. In addition, the truck's exertion of force on the car is reacted to via Newton's third law. and the car's exertion of force on the truck is reacted to via Newton's third law.

Taking the car individually, it has the force from the truck acting on it. Plus it has the reaction force from having acted upon the truck.

I suspect that my logic is flawed but I cannot see why. Should I treat each body's forces as though it slammed into a wall? You slam into the wall, exerting a force on it, whereupon the wall returns the favour. It just seems different to me. The vehicle has velocity whereas a wall does not.

Confused
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K