Simple Constant acceleration equation but I dont get it

AI Thread Summary
A particle initially moving at 5 m/s reverses direction to the same speed in 1 second, and the problem involves calculating the distance traveled under constant acceleration. The user initially applies the equation for displacement but confuses distance with displacement, leading to an incorrect conclusion of zero distance. The distinction between distance (total path traveled) and displacement (net change in position) is clarified, emphasizing that the particle travels a total distance despite returning to its starting point. The correct approach involves recognizing that the distance is not zero, as it accounts for the entire journey. Understanding this fundamental difference resolves the confusion in the calculations.
FireWarden
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle moving at 5 m/s reverses its direction in 1s to move at 5 m/s in the opposite direction. If is acceleration is constant, what distance does it travel?


Homework Equations


The constant acceleration equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I use x=vot + 1/2at2 were a= (vfinal- vinitial)/t. I get the wrong answer. Something about having to plug in half the time for some reason that I don't understand. Would some one please help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FireWarden said:
I get the wrong answer.

Can you show us what answer you got and how?
 
I get get the answer to be distance equals 0 because i use:

vi to be 5 m/s
vf to be -5m/s
a to be -10

I plug those into the equations mentioned above. It seems to be the incorrect answer but doesn't it make sense? I must be missing fundamental here.
 
You have correctly found zero which is the displacement. However the problem is asking to find the distance. Distance is not the same as displacement. Imagine an odometer hooked up to the particle. By how much has the odometer changed when the particle has gone out and come back to where it started?
 
I got it. Thanks.

Much much karma to you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top