Simple Derivation giving me a headache.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimbo57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
Jimbo57
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Deriving http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP20181a00e6i82g005gag00005gb4c7hic8g2i3hi?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=57&w=79&h=43


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt gives me:
-48/(x^2-16)^2 + 192x^2/(x^2-16)^3 via product rule

Wolfram alpha gives me this for an answer

http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP40371a00e53i06h6352d000061574g9ehi6a9958?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=15&w=224&h=48

I can't seem to figure out how to match my answer with Wolfram, even though it's not a tough derivative. Am I maybe not simplifying enough?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jimbo57 said:

Homework Statement


Deriving http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP20181a00e6i82g005gag00005gb4c7hic8g2i3hi?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=57&w=79&h=43

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt gives me:
-48/(x^2-16)^2 + 192x^2/(x^2-16)^3 via product rule

Wolfram alpha gives me this for an answer

http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP40371a00e53i06h6352d000061574g9ehi6a9958?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=15&w=224&h=48

I can't seem to figure out how to match my answer with Wolfram, even though it's not a tough derivative. Am I maybe not simplifying enough?

A simple trick that you can use to see if your answer actually matches up is to let x be a transcendental number like \pi in your answer, then in Wolfram's. Since we're dealing with rational coefficients and exponents throughout, there is no way they can match up unless the answers are algebraically equivalent. They do match up in this case.

So it's just a matter of rearranging your equation. Try reexpressing -48/(x^2-16)^2 as -\frac{48(x^2 - 16)}{{(x^2 - 16)}^3} for starters, then combine the numerators over a common denominator.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The answers are equivalent. In order to get it into the same form, you need to make a common denominator.
 
Ahh I see it now, thanks so much guys. Simple mistake, maybe I need a break...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top