Simple Derivation Of Diode Equation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 03myersd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Diode
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the diode equation, focusing on the request for a simple derivation suitable for an advanced higher project. Participants explore various aspects of the derivation, including necessary equations and assumptions, while some express urgency due to project deadlines.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks the simplest derivation of the diode equation for a project, expressing difficulty in finding an adequate reference.
  • Another participant suggests that a simple derivation may not be possible and mentions the need to use the continuity equation and boundary conditions, which complicate the derivation.
  • A later post reiterates the desire for a simplified explanation of the derivation steps without needing to fully understand them.
  • One participant provides a detailed derivation involving various equations and assumptions, including the built-in voltage and minority carrier concentration.
  • A participant questions a specific step in the derivation, noting that the expression for built-in voltage computes to zero under certain conditions and requests clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the simplicity of the derivation, with some arguing that it cannot be simplified while others seek a more straightforward explanation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the clarity of specific steps in the derivation.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of certain mathematical steps, particularly concerning the built-in voltage and its implications in the derivation. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding and assumptions about the derivation process.

03myersd
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I am looking for the simplest possible derivation of the diode equation. I need it to reference to it in my advanced higher project. Basically I have to dissect it. I unfortunately don't know how to derive it and I can't find one simple enough to use.

This is what I am trying to end up with:

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/0d2e6cbc92.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think it's possible to get to that equation through a simple derivation. I remember that the continuity equation must be used (in one dimension, for simplicity) and then incorporate boundary conditions and these definitely are not simple. so you might need to reference the whole derivation, though you can skip obvious steps.

Anyway, I got two pages of simple derivation. I can send these later to you as I haven't got a scanner here?

Good luck
 
Last edited:
Well ideally the simplest way possible. Or even just an explanation of the steps. I am so glad that I don't have to understand it at this point. :smile:
 
Please anyone? The report is due in at 3.30 today and I would really like to have the analysis of the derivation included in it. Its not essential but it would essentially round the whole thing off nicely.

Thanks
 
03myersd said:
Please
anyone? The report is due in at 3.30 today and I would really like to
have the analysis of the derivation included in it. Its not essential
but it would essentially round the whole thing off nicely.
Thanks
Here's the derivation; I hope it's not late
{L_p} = diffusion length of holes ({cm})
{D_p} = diffusion constant ({cm^2}/s)
{L_p} = average carrier life time (s)

Firstly, we find \Delta{p}

where \Delta{p} is the minority carrier concentration at the
edge of the depletion region (DP)

we know that the built-in voltage is given by

{V_{bi}} = \frac{kT}{q}\ln({\frac{{N_A}{N_D}}{n_{i^2}}})

Applying the law of mass action {n_{i^2}} =<br /> <br /> {n_{no}}\times{p_{no}}

we get

{V_{bi}} = \frac{kT}{q}\ln({\frac{{n_{no}}{p_{no}}}{n_{i^2}}})

Rearranging

p_{po} = p_{no}\exp(\frac{qV_{bi}}{kT}) => eqn.1

For non-equilibrium situation, i.e. when there's forward bias voltage

{V_f}

p_{p(0)} = p_{n(0)}\exp(\frac{q(V_{bi}-{V_f})}{kT}) => eqn.2

or
p_{po} = p_{no}\exp(\frac{qV}{kT})

where V = {V_{bi}}-V_f

assuming low injection level, i.e. {p_p}\approx{p_{po}}

eqn.1/eqn.2 by doing this we get \Delta{p}

therefore

\Delta{p} = p_{no}\exp(\frac{qV}{kT}-1)

Using the continuity equation, we get an expression for the current density

J_{p(x)} = q\frac{D_p}{L_p}\delta_{p(x)}

since \Delta{p} = \delta_{p(x=0)}

so \delta_{p(x=0)}= p_{no}\exp(\frac{qV}{kT}-1)

J_{p(x)} = q\frac{{D_p}{p_{no}}}{L_p}\exp(\frac{qV}{kT}-1)

Doing the same with electrons, we get a similar expression, hence

J_{total} = J_p + J_n = J_s\exp(\frac{qV}{kT}-1)

This is the standard way of expressing the diode equation. However, if we multiply the above expression by the cross-section area, we get the current I.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: navi
August_2007, after the statement "Applying the law of mass action we get ...", the expression for Vbi computes to zero. Since ni^2 = nn0*pn0, then ni^2/(nn0*pn0) must equal 1. So, the ln (1) is zero. So Vbi becomes zero.

Could you clarify? Thanks.

Claude
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K