Simple differentiation mistake?

influx
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
edcacf.png


The working out states that v = (m/r)sin(theta) but surely this should be (-m/r)sin(theta) ? I mean there is a negative in front of the ∂Ψ/dx ?

Also, if v=0 then 0 = (m/r)sin(theta), therefore sin(theta) = 0? And from this we know cos(theta) = 1 or -1 which would mean u = Uinfinity + (m/r) or Uinfinity - (m/r) as opposed to u = Uinfinity + (m/x) as they got?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
influx said:
The working out states that v = (m/r)sin(theta) but surely this should be (-m/r)sin(theta) ? I mean there is a negative in front of the ∂Ψ/dx ?
When you take the derivative of ##\arctan (y/x)## with respect to ##x##, you also get a ##-1## factor as ##x## is in the denominator. That cancels the first minus sign.

influx said:
Also, if v=0 then 0 = (m/r)sin(theta), therefore sin(theta) = 0? And from this we know cos(theta) = 1 or -1 which would mean u = Uinfinity + (m/r) or Uinfinity - (m/r) as opposed to u = Uinfinity + (m/x) as they got?
##x=r\cos \theta##, so ##u=U_\infty +\frac{m}{r}\cos \theta## becomes ##u=U_\infty+\frac{m}{x}## (the ##\cos \theta## cancels out, so it doesn't matter if it is +1 or -1).
 
Last edited:
influx said:
edcacf.png


The working out states that v = (m/r)sin(theta) but surely this should be (-m/r)sin(theta) ? I mean there is a negative in front of the ∂Ψ/dx ?

Also, if v=0 then 0 = (m/r)sin(theta), therefore sin(theta) = 0? And from this we know cos(theta) = 1 or -1 which would mean u = Uinfinity + (m/r) or Uinfinity - (m/r) as opposed to u = Uinfinity + (m/x) as they got?
I think it has to do with the way the arctan is used here. There are two arguments, x and y, instead of one. There is a special rule for the derivative of tan-1(y/x), as shown in this article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differentiation_rules#Derivatives_of_trigonometric_functions
 
Samy_A said:
##x=r\cos \theta##, so ##u=U_\infty +\frac{m}{r}\cos \theta## becomes ##u=U_\infty+\frac{m}{x}## (the ##\cos \theta## cancels out, so it doesn't matter if it is +1 or -1).
Oops, the stated reason is wrong.

Actually, ##u=U_\infty +\frac{m}{r}\cos \theta=U_\infty +\frac{m}{x}\cos² \theta##, and as ##\cos \theta =\pm 1##, we get ##u=U_\infty+\frac{m}{x}##.

Sorry for the mistake.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top