SIMPLE e&m question: finding equivalent capacitance

AI Thread Summary
To find the equivalent capacitance (C(eq)) of capacitors in series, the formula used is 1/C(eq) = 1/C(1) + 1/C(2). For capacitors of 6.0 µF and 3.0 µF, this calculation becomes 1/C(eq) = 1/6 + 1/3. Converting 1/3 to a common denominator gives 1/3 = 2/6, resulting in 1/C(eq) = 3/6. Inverting this fraction leads to C(eq) = 2.0 µF, confirming the calculation. The process illustrates the method for determining equivalent capacitance in series configurations.
offbeatjumi
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I am missing something very simple... in my book, it gives, for capacitors in series, that:

1/C(eq) = 1/C(1) + 1/C(2)
using numbers, it says...

1/C(eq) = 1/6.0 uF + 1/3.0 uF ... C(eq) = 2.0 uF

I cannot figure out how they got C(eq) = 2.0 uF

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1/Ceq = 1/6 + 1/3 --> 1/6 + 2/6 = 3/6

3/6 = 1/2 = 1/ Ceq...

to find Ceq flip --> Ceq = 2uF
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top