Simple economics question that I can't get a good answer to.

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Economics
AI Thread Summary
In economics, the convention of placing price on the Y-axis and quantity on the X-axis stems from historical practices and the foundational principles of supply and demand analysis. While it may seem that quantity is dependent on price, the relationship is more complex, with both variables influencing each other. Price shifts often result from changes in quantity demanded, but the demand and supply curves illustrate that both price and quantity are outcomes of market dynamics. The demand curve is derived from maximizing utility based on given prices and income, while the supply curve comes from maximizing revenue based on production costs and prices. This framework assumes agents are price takers, determining quantity based on existing prices. The discussion also highlights the distinction between moving along the curves versus shifting them, indicating the roles of exogenous and endogenous variables in economic modeling. Ultimately, while textbooks may simplify these relationships, real-world scenarios, particularly in oligopoly markets, reveal a more intricate interdependence between price and quantity.
wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
Why is it that when you're showing a graph in anything relating to economics, Price is on the Y axis and Quantity is on the X axis? Doesn't it seem that the quantity is dependent upon the price, rather than the opposite? I realize that neither one nor the other is totally independent or totally dependent, but it just seems that price shifts are far more commonly due to changes in quantity demanded than the other way around.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe it may have its 'historical' reasons. The demand and supply curves show the quantity demanded and supplied at any given price assuming all other variables hold constant; so you're kind of right, price is the determining factor. But as long as there is consistency, it should alright, but note that a lot of other analyses including demand shifts and etc are based on Y(price)-X(qnt). Also, the amount of products sold can be determined by the more familiar 'area under the curve' instead of 'area to the left of the curve', which may be more appealing in some ways.
 
Actually price and quantity are mutual variables; each can be determined by the other. Quantity can determine price. For example if there is a glut of widgets, the price of widgets will fall, and if there is a widget shortage it will rise. This is the de Beers philosophy in marketing diamonds.
 
On a supply-demand curve it's supply and demand that are the determining factors, both quantity and price are results.
 
It's historical. In consumer theory you derive the individual demand curve by maximizinging your utility function given prices and income. So price is the independent variable, quantity the dependent. In 'the theory of firm' you get the individual supply curves from maximizing your revenue function where you adjust quantity by given factor prices and given price of the good you produce.

So the agents in crazy neoclassical complete market micro are always price takers. Given some prices, income, costs- what quantity would you choose? That gives the curves. Add them all together, you get the aggregate supply and demand curves.

On a supply-demand curve it's supply and demand that are the determining factors, both quantity and price are results.

Well, there is shifting the curves and moving along the cuves. Or in eco lingo, exogeneous and endogeneous variables.
You first need demand and supply curves to begin with. They are formed in micro theory as described above.

Actually price and quantity are mutual variables; each can be determined by the other.
Only in the real world, not in your average microeconomics textbook.
Allright, in oligopoly theory you have this obvious interdependence, but the nice demand and supply curves are gone.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top