MHB Simple Grammar Problem: Is "a" or "the" Ideal in Lie Algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter topsquark
  • Start date Start date
topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
My slight confusion here is probably a simple grammatical problem.

Let h and k be ideals of a Lie algebra g.
Now let h be a maximal solvable ideal (i.e.one enclosed in no larger solvable ideal) of g. If k is any other solvable ideal, then so is h + k, and thus the maximality requirement implies h + k = h and hence [math]k \subseteq h[/math].
My question is about the "a." I'm thinking that it should be "the." Aren't all ideals subalgebras of the maximal ideal?

Also: How do you pronounce "Lie?" Is it "lee" or "lye?"

-Dan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
topsquark said:
...Also: How do you pronounce "Lie?" Is it "lee" or "lye?"

-Dan

It is "lee":

https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Lie_algebra.html
 
Hi,

There is only one maximal solvable ideal, but the "a" fits better than a "the", because the uniqueness is proved after you have choose the maximal solvable ideal. (Sometimes I'm too demanding, huh?(Wondering)).

This ideal is also called the radical of the Lie algebra g (It will probably appear just after this proof if you have read it on a book.)
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi,

There is only one maximal solvable ideal, but the "a" fits better than a "the", because the uniqueness is proved after you have choose the maximal solvable ideal. (Sometimes I'm too demanding, huh?(Wondering)).

This ideal is also called the radical of the Lie algebra g (It will probably appear just after this proof if you have read it on a book.)
It's a good point. And yes, the text did immediately then show uniqueness. I didn't consider the logical order there since I already knew the maximal solvable ideal was unique.

Thanks!

-Dan
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
432
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top