Simple Harmonic Motion at Relativistic Speeds

Washer101
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
On The Student Room I saw a couple of guys looking at whether the rules for Simple Harmonic Motion at non-relativistic speeds (e.g. a = -w2y and so on) would work if the maximum velocity of the particle hits relativistic speeds.

Many Thanks
W101
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you get a different set of differential equations whose non-linearity makes them difficult to solve. And that's all I know about it.
 
Washer101 said:
On The Student Room I saw a couple of guys looking at whether the rules for Simple Harmonic Motion at non-relativistic speeds (e.g. a = -w2y and so on) would work if the maximum velocity of the particle hits relativistic speeds.

Many Thanks
Have a look at
Relativistic (an)harmonic oscillator
Moreau, William; Easther, Richard; Neutze, Richard
American Journal of Physics, Volume 62, Issue 6, pp. 531-535 (1994).

The relativistic extension of one-dimensional simple harmonic motion is developed in the Lagrangian formalism. The relativistic equations of motion are derived and solved analytically. The motion with respect to proper time is analyzed in terms of an effective potential energy. While the motion remains bounded and periodic, the effect of time dilation along the world line is to cause it to become anharmonic with the period increasing with amplitude and the curvature concentrated at the turning points.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top