Simple magnetic forces and angular momentum conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the cancellation of internal torques from magnetic forces between two point charges moving with nonparallel velocities. It highlights that while the magnetic forces are equal and opposite, their torques do not generally cancel, raising concerns about the potential change in angular momentum without external forces. The conversation also notes that linear momentum is not conserved in electromagnetic systems unless the momentum of the electric and magnetic fields is included. Additionally, it references the Trouton-Noble experiment, which relates to special relativity and the behavior of angular momentum in such systems. Overall, the complexities of electromagnetic interactions and their implications for momentum conservation are emphasized.
readywil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about internal torques and why they cancel, and I can't figure out how torques from magnetic forces cancel.

Say you have two point charges moving with nonparallel velocities. The magnetic forces they exert on each other are opposite and equal, but they aren't along the line between the two charges, so their torques don't cancel in general.

This is worrying to me because it means that their angular momentum could change without an external force, which seems wrong. Could someone please show me where I'm going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There really shouldn't be a force in any direction other than along the line connecting two particles. But yeah, I get the same thing. If the velocities aren't parallel, I get non-zero net torque on the Lorentz Force.

I'm really not sure what's going on, but keeping in mind that both of these charges are going to be accelerating due to the forces they apply on each other (especially with non-perpendicular velocities) there is also going to be radiation from each of the charges, which might provide recoil sufficient to offset this difference.
 
The linear momentum of the particles in an electromagnetic system is also not conserved, in general. In order to regain conservation of linear and angular momentum, you have to include the linear and angular momentum of the E and B fields themselves.
 
readywil said:
I was thinking about internal torques and why they cancel, and I can't figure out how torques from magnetic forces cancel.

Say you have two point charges moving with nonparallel velocities. The magnetic forces they exert on each other are opposite and equal, but they aren't along the line between the two charges, so their torques don't cancel in general.

This is worrying to me because it means that their angular momentum could change without an external force, which seems wrong. Could someone please show me where I'm going wrong?
You are describing the Trouton-Noble experiment, which tested special relativity.
In fact the angular momentum of the two charges increases, but there is no tendency to rotate.. Try <http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0603/0603110v3.pdf>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top