Simple maximization question very confused :s

gajanan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey everybody!

My question is: Find the value of x that maximizes the following function and the maximum
value (a is constant): f(x) = x^2 subject to 0 ≤ x ≤ a.

It is supposed to be solved without calculus and I'm terrible confused! how would i go about solving this? wen i plot the curve i of course get half a parabola (positive half), and given the constraint 0 ≤ x ≤ a, the graph gets limited. I am confused what the answer to this question would be :s! would it be a^2 as the maximum value and a as the value of x that maximizes the function, or would it simply be 0 or not possible?!? any help would be appreciated greatly!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Basic arithmetic x > y > 0 => x2 > y2, so the max is at a and the max value is a2.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top