Simple Newton's 2nd Law problem Why isn't this answer right, though?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a Newton's 2nd Law problem involving a crate being pulled along a horizontal surface with friction. The original poster presents their calculations for the acceleration of the crate but finds their answer differs from the expected result.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Newton's laws to find the acceleration but questions their calculations after receiving an unexpected result. Other participants inquire about the diagram and the relationship between tension and the applied force, suggesting a deeper analysis of the forces acting on the system.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the problem, with some suggesting that the tension in the rope may not be equal to the applied force due to the massless pulley. There is a recognition of the complexity introduced by the pulley system, and multiple interpretations of the forces involved are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the massless pulley and the forces acting on it, which raises questions about the assumptions made in the original calculations. The original poster expresses confusion over the role of tension in the system, indicating a need for clarification on the setup.

Lo.Lee.Ta.
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
1. "A 40.0-kg crate is pulled along a horizontal floor by the ideal arrangement
shown in figure below. The force F is 280 N. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the crate and the floor is 0.170. What is the acceleration of the crate?"


______box---^=Pulley__

Okay, this is a weird drawing of the situation. Just a box on a flat surface.
It's attached by a string to a pulley and the other end of the string is anchored to a
cone (^).

So I thought the solution is just this:

εF(y) = ma(y)

-w + N = ma(y)
-392 + N = (40)(0)
N= 392N

εF(x) = ma(x)
-f + F = ma(x)
[mu(k)](N) + 280 = (40)(a)
(.17)(-392) + 280 = (40)(a)
a= 5.33m/s^2

BUT, this is not the right answer on my test!
The right answer is 1.83m/s^2.
How do you get that answer?

Thank you so much! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you post the diagram? It's not clear what the arrangement is.
 
crateonfloor.jpg


Okay, this is it.
 
Okay. If the pulley is massless, how is the tension in the cord related to the force F?

(a) Tension = F
(b) Tension = F/2
 
Lo.Lee.Ta. said:
crateonfloor.jpg


Okay, this is it.
Good. So now figure out the tension in the rope. That will tell you the force on the crate.
 
Um, okay...

So I looked up the formula for tension in a rope.

They say it's: F(tens.) = ma - (mu)(-mg)

To find the a, I did: F = ma
280 = (40)(a)
a = 7m/s^2

So, that means it's: F(tens.) = (40)(7) - (.17)(-392)
F(tension) = 346.64N

So, then I thought I would use the tension force instead of the F...

-f + T = ma(x)

-392 + 346.64 = (40)(a)
a = -1.134m/s^2 BUT THIS IS NOT RIGHT...

It's negative. I don't really know what's wrong. I'm thinking the F(tension) is wrong... =_=
 
To find the tension in the rope analyze the forces acting on that massless pulley.
 
It seems to me that the tension would be equal to the force, F.

Pulley:
ƩF(x) = ma(x)
-T + 280 = (0)(a)
T = 280

So I still don't see why the Tension isn't the same thing as the Force F...

Box:
ƩF(x) = ma(x)
-f + T = ma(x)
(.17)(-392) + 280 = 40(a)
a = 5.334m/s^2... The same wrong answer... Is there some force on the Pulley I'm leaving out?!
It is massless, so there would be no N force or weight.
 
If you look at the pulley, then you have two tension forces acting to the left.
So, 2T = F
→ T = 140N
 
  • #10
WOOO! Hallelujah!

Thanks, ap123! I've been working on this problem FOR-EVER!
But what the heck?!
2 tensions?
Is this because of the tension where the string attaches to the box AND where the string from the pulley attaches to the cone?
-Both are pointing in the left direction.
 
  • #11
Yes.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K