Understanding the Probability Density of Psi in Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTdan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the probability density of Psi in quantum mechanics. It clarifies that Psi represents the wave function, and its squared magnitude gives the probability distribution of finding a particle in a given state. The concept of a particle in a box illustrates that the probability distribution can extend beyond classical boundaries, allowing for phenomena like quantum tunneling. The mention of particles traveling through higher dimensions, such as an 11th dimension, is deemed misleading and not a standard prediction of quantum mechanics. The conversation emphasizes the importance of critically evaluating unconventional explanations in quantum physics courses.
GTdan
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I wasn't sure if I could ask this question in the other forum so I am posting it here. This is simply a qualitative question. I am taking an advanced Chemistry course that is all about quantum mechanics and some molecular physics. We were talking about the probability density of Psi.

I was always under the impression that the graph of this shows the probability of finding a particle at some energy in some state. But my professor said something about it tells all the places that the particle can be in that state. Then he said that (using the example of a particle in a box), a particle can get out regardless of its energy sometimes because it goes through different dimensions beyond the normal 3 or 4 we have.

I don't know, but I have never heard about particles flying through different dimensions before. Is it possible he explained it wrong or I heard wrong? I know for a fact he mentioned particles going through an 11th dimension but maybe he was talking about something else? Quantum Mechanics doesn't really predict this does it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oh no!

Hi GTdan,

let me try to help here. Psi is the wave function. Let's work in ONE dimension to keep things simple. So, Psi is a function of x. If you take (Psi*)(Psi) you get the probability distribution. This will also be a function of x and will tell you where the particle has a chance of being if you make a measurement.

The weird thing is that if you try to enclose the particle in a potential well (the particle in a box) that the probability distribution has a non-zero value in places outside the box where it would classicaly be 0. This means the particle has a chance of tunneling through the potential barrier and getting out of the box. This doesn't involve travel in any extra spatial dimensions. Seems like who ever was teaching the course has been watching too many Brian Green specials :wink:
 
See that's what I was thinking. Thanks for the explanation. I may have to be a bit skeptical of things in that class if it starts to sound a little off. (Sorry for the VERY slow response- my classes started to overwhelm me and I completely forgot I had posted this topic!)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top