Can Arctan(11/2) Be Expressed in Terms of Pi?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbzima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
AI Thread Summary
Arctan(11/2) cannot be expressed as a rational multiple of pi, similar to arctan(1/2). The discussion highlights that arctan(11/2) can be analyzed through polar coordinates, leading to the equation z^3 = 2 + 11i. By expressing this in polar form, the relationship between arctan(11/2) and arctan(1/2) is established, showing that arctan(1/2) equals three times arctan(11/2). The calculations confirm the connection between these trigonometric functions and their expressions in complex numbers.
rbzima
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Can anyone express arctan(11/2) in terms of pi. Is there an easy way to do this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I do not remember the proof, however I remember that arctan (1/2) is not expressible as a rational multiple of pi.

Now, looking at 11 squared plus 2 squared, we get 125, which is a nice cube. Hence let's find z where z^3 = 2 + 11i.

Expressing in Polar form, we get;
z^3 = \sqrt{125}\exp ( i \arctan (11/2).

Since 125 is a nice cube, one value of z is \sqrt{5} \exp ( \frac{ i \arctan (11/2)}{3})

Some very hefty trig manipulations and converting back to Cartesian form gives 2+11i, cubing that we can easily verify the calculation. Essentially this implies that arctan (1/2) = 3 arctan (11/2).
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top