Simple question regarding annihilaion

  • Thread starter Thread starter humsafar
  • Start date Start date
humsafar
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
if annihilation of particles(let's say proton-antiproton) releases x energy at 2 giga electron volts, then if we annihilate it at let's say 4 GeV, would we be getting double the energy?

also, i have seen the wikipedia page of annihilation of proton and antiproton which mentions the energy levels at 2 GeV but does not mention released energy at rest "clearly"...please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The calculation is simplified in the c.m. system; proton and anti-proton have energy-momentum (E, p) and (E, -p). The sum ist (2E, 0), so 2E is the c.o.m energy. Of course E and p are related via E² - p² = m² where m is the rst mass m=938 MeV.
 


humsafar said:
if annihilation of particles(let's say proton-antiproton) releases x energy at 2 giga electron volts, then if we annihilate it at let's say 4 GeV, would we be getting double the energy?

also, i have seen the wikipedia page of annihilation of proton and antiproton which mentions the energy levels at 2 GeV but does not mention released energy at rest "clearly"...please help

If one could cause an annihilation with both particles at rest, the result is simply twice the rest mass energy (2*938 MeV ~2 GeV). However experimentally you send two streams of particles at some velocity toward each other, so the momentum at annihilation is not zero (rest momentum) and contributes to the total energy.
 
Thanks for the answers...but please try to explain in layman terms...I'm not a physicist by profession here...just doing my b.s in Computer science...I don't get the c.m system...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top