Simple Redshift Question/Orbital Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmb2009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redshift Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around calculating the radial speed of a distant quasar based on its observed redshift. The observed spectral line at 559 nm, compared to the emitted 446 nm, indicates a redshift that can be analyzed using the formula z = (λ_observed - λ_emitted)/λ_emitted. Participants clarify that the velocity calculated from this redshift is the radial velocity, not orbital velocity, and emphasize the importance of using the relativistic Doppler effect for high recession velocities typical of quasars. The initial confusion regarding the relevance of certain formulas is resolved, leading to a successful calculation of the quasar's speed. Understanding the distinction between radial and orbital velocities is crucial in astrophysical contexts.
bmb2009
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When studying the optical spectrum of a very distant quasar (quasi stellar object), they found that a certain spectral line appears at a wavelength of 559 nm instead of the regular 446 nm. In terms of the speed of the light, what is the radial speed of the quasar with respect to Earth?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the fact that the redshift z= (λ_observed - λ_emitted)/(λ_emitted) and then
1 + z = 1/(sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2)) and then solving for v.. But is this "v" the orbital velocity? And I did convert my answer into terms of the speed of light so that's not the part that's wrong. Any help? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no orbital velocity.

1 + z = 1/(sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2))
Where does that formula come from? That looks like the transversal doppler effect, which is not relevant here.
A calculated v would be the radial velocity of the quasar, if redshift would come from moving objects (it does not, but you have to assume this here as it seems).
 
what velocity equation is relevant here then?
 
For high recession velocities (like those of quasars) you're probably expected to employ the relativistic Doppler effect relationship.
 
Ahhh good idea... and yep it worked.. Thank you!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top