Simple solutions question (dilution)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rujano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dilution
AI Thread Summary
To find the final concentration of the Fe3+ solution after dilution, the formula C1*M1 = C2*M2 can be applied. The initial concentration of Fe3+ is 0.0007 mol/L, and the volume is 3 mL, which will be diluted to a final volume of 100 mL. It is important to consider the presence of SCN- and whether it is in excess, as this could affect the equilibrium and concentration of the complex formed. The final concentration will depend on the moles of the target ion after dilution and the total volume. Clarifying the final concentration of which specific ion is essential for accurate calculations.
Rujano
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Hi. If I have 3 mL of a Fe3+ solution (0.0007 mol/L) and that is treated with SCN- to form a complex and then is diluted until I have 100 mL of a solution.

What would be the final concentraton of that solution?

Homework Equations



C1*M1= C2*M2

The Attempt at a Solution



I Thought of the equation above, but I know that the formation of that comple must change something!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rujano said:
What would be the final concentraton of that solution?

Concentration of what? You have several ions present (I can list about a dozen, but you don't have to know about most of them).
 
How many moles of your target compound or ion? What final volume is the solution? Molarity is moles per Liter. Is thiocyanate ion added in excess of the ferric ion?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top