Simple Work Energy Principle Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a dinner plate being pushed along a table. The applied force of 3.0 N results in 1.67 J of work, while the work done by gravity and the normal force is confirmed to be 0 J due to no movement in the vertical direction. The normal force is calculated as 6.122 N, but it does not contribute to work since it acts perpendicular to the displacement. The force of kinetic friction is determined to be 2.69 N, resulting in -1.62 J of work due to its opposing direction. Overall, the calculations for the applied force and friction are correct, while the normal force's work is appropriately deemed zero.
Kathy W
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I think I did most of this question correctly, but I think I might be overlooking a few steps because I might have thought about it too simply.

  1. A dinner plate of mass 510 g is pushed 60 cm along a dining table by a constant force of 3.0 N directed 22° below the horizontal. If the coefficient of kinetic friction between the plate and the table’s surface is 0.44, determine the work done on the plate by
    • a) the applied force
    • b) the force of gravity
    • c) the normal force
    • d) the force of kinetic friction
Attempt at solution

a) Work of FApplied= Fdcosθ
= (3N)(0.6m)(cos22)
=1.67 J

Am I correct in assuming this was asking about the horizontal work because there was no movement in the y-plane?

b) Force of Gravity
Fgravity=mg
=(0.51)(9.8)
=4.998 N

Work gravity= Fd
= (4.998N)(0)
=0 Joules

c) **This is where I am also confused... the normal force is greater than the force of gravity do to the additional force being applied downward, does that mean that work is done in this plane or is it still 0 because there is no movement?

Fapplied y= (sin22)(3)
FAy= 1.124

FN=mg+FAy
= 4.998+1.124
= 6.122 N

W= Fd
= (6.122)(0)
= 0 Joules ***? Is this right, I'm really not sure?

d) Force of kinetic friction

Ffr= μkFN
=(0.44)(6.122)
=2.69N

Work of friction= Fdcosθ
= (2.69)(0.6)(cos180)
= -1.62 Joules

I know this is a simple question, I just want to make sure I am in the correct direction with my post, I appreciate any help immensely!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since this looks like a homework question, I will ask: What makes you doubt your answer for part c)?
 
Yes , the work done by normal would be zero ( N ⊥ d ) .

I think the rest is fine .
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top