Simple Work-Energy Problem is stumping me

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work-energy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a work-energy problem involving a disk and its kinetic energy in relation to its rotation about different points. Participants are examining the implications of using different moments of inertia in the context of the disk being pinned at a specific point.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the appropriateness of using the moment of inertia about the center of the disk versus the hinge point. There is a discussion about the kinetic energy contributions from different rotational perspectives and the implications of the disk's motion relative to the bar and ground.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the kinetic energy formulation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the parallel axis theorem and the consideration of translation in the kinetic energy calculations. There is no explicit consensus yet on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the disk's rotation and the constraints imposed by the problem statement, particularly regarding the pinning of the disk and its implications for kinetic energy calculations.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


So I am going over some old problem as review. I have the solution to this problem and something is bothering me about it.

Here is the problem and solution:
Picture1-27.png
what bothers me is this: When they are finding the expression for the kinetic energy of the disk, they use I about its center 'A' and not about the hinge-point of the system 'O'.

The statement says that the "bar is welded at A"... and hence it cannot rotate about A. Angular velocity [itex]\omega[/itex] that they are using is of the bar not the disk about its center.

Shouldn't the expression for the KE of disk use I about A ?EDIT:

Picture2-16.png


I get this...the disk does not rotate, hence no KE (angular) ... but in the first version i think angular KE should be WRT point A
Here is the solution to the version where the disk is "pinned at A with a SMOOTH pin"...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at their formulation of the disk's kinetic energy. It has two terms, one describing the rotation of the disk about it's center, and one describing the rotation of the disk about O. If you like, you can use the parallel axis theorem to compute the inertia of the disk about O. You should get the same answer.

The difference is that when you consider the rotation of the disk about it's own center, you need to account for the translation of the disk separately. Using the inertia of the object about it's instantaneous center of rotation has this translation "built in" to the inertia.

-Kerry
 
KLoux said:
Take a look at their formulation of the disk's kinetic energy. It has two terms

Yes I understand this...

one describing the rotation of the disk about it's center, and one describing the rotation of the disk about O.

...I do not understand this. It is not rotating about its center, so why does it make sense to talk about its KE like this?

Thanks,
Casey
 
The disk is rotating around it's center. If you painted a horizontal mark on the right side of the disk, and let the whole system swing down 90 degrees, where will the mark be? Will the disk have rotated? I think what you're getting at is that the disk did not rotate relative to the bar. This is correct. When you consider the system, you need to consider the rotation of the disk relative to some fixed set of axis. The disk will rotate relative to a set of axis fixed to the ground.

If you're still having trouble accepting this, I recommend working through the problem using the inertia of the disk about point O, just so you can see that the math is the same.

-Kerry
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
5K