Simplification in Schrodinger derivation

TheFerruccio
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework question. This is not for a course. However, I got a warning for posting such questions elsewhere, so, I suppose I must post them here.

Homework Statement


The following is an excerpt of the derivation of the Schrodinger equation. After deriving the Klein-Gordon equation, the relativistic total energy is approximated to arrive at the Schrodinger equation.

Homework Equations



E = mc^2\sqrt{1+\frac{p^2}{m^2c^2}}
\approx mc^2\left(1+\frac{1}{2}\frac{p^2}{m^2c^2}\right)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, frankly, I do not see how they went from the first step to the second step. Where did the 1/2 come from? How does the removal of the square root effectively approximate this? I am not seeing it. Was a conjugate used and multiplied somehow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may also help you to play around with some of these plots to get a feel for how well the approximations work. For example, letting ##x = p/(mc)##, take a look at a comparison of the two curves, plotted with wolframalpha:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Plot[{Sqrt[1+x^2],1+x^2/2},{x,0,1}]

Play around with some other examples of the binomial approximation as well.
 
Thank you! This is perfect. I do not know how I managed to get this far without having heard of the binomial approximation, and having tutored math for years. I guess I am one of the lucky ten thousand.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top