Simplify Fractions: (3-x)(x+2)(2x+9) < 0 | Multiply and Solve

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrNeWBiE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the inequality 2x+9/(3-x)(x+2) < 0 by multiplying both sides by (3-x)(x+2), resulting in (3-x)(x+2)(2x+9) < 0. Participants clarify that multiplying by (3-x)^2(x+2)^2 maintains the inequality's direction since these factors are always positive. The conversation emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the multiplication does not affect the inequality's validity. Overall, the focus is on understanding how to manipulate the inequality correctly while maintaining its properties. The participants express enthusiasm and support for each other's learning process.
MrNeWBiE
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
question in fractions,,,

how

2x+9/(3-x)(x+2) < 0

became



(3-x)(x+2)(2x+9) < 0 " multiply both sides "

zero is in the other side ,,,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MrNeWBiE! :smile:

'cos one is (3-x)2(x+2)2 times the other … which is always positive! :wink:
 


so i multiply both sides with ====> (3-x)^2(x+2)^2
 
(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Yup! :biggrin:
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top