Simplify Radicals: -3\sqrt[6]{3}, 2\sqrt[3]{192}, \sqrt[6]{320} and More!

  • Thread starter Thread starter zelda1850
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radicals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying various radical expressions, with participants checking each other's work for accuracy. Key points include the importance of correctly identifying the indices of radicals, as several errors were noted when participants omitted or misrepresented these indices. For example, in one case, -3√[3]{-3} was incorrectly simplified, leading to confusion. Additionally, the formatting of the expressions was critiqued for being cluttered, suggesting a more streamlined approach using LaTeX for clarity. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for precision in both mathematical operations and presentation.
zelda1850
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
im not sure if I am doing these questions correctly can someone check it

1) -3\sqrt[6]{3} - 2\sqrt[3]{192} - \sqrt[6]{320}

-3\sqrt[6]{3} = -3\sqrt[6]{3}

2\sqrt[3]{192} = 6\sqrt[6]{3}

\sqrt[6]{320} = 2\sqrt[6]{5}

3\sqrt[6]{3} + 6\sqrt[6]{3} + 2\sqrt[6]{5}

= 3\sqrt[6]{3} - 2\sqrt[6]{5}

2) -3\sqrt[3]{-3} + 2\sqrt[3]{162} + 3\sqrt[3]{81}

-3\sqrt[3]{-3} = -3\sqrt[3]{3}

2\sqrt[3]{162} = 6\sqrt[3]{6}

3\sqrt[3]{81} = 9\sqrt[3]{3}

-3\sqrt[3]{3} + 9\sqrt[3]{3} + 6\sqrt[3]{6}

= 6\sqrt[3]{3} + 6\sqrt[3]{6}

3) 4\sqrt[6]{3} + 2\sqrt[4]{32} - 3\sqrt[6]{192}
- 2\sqrt[6]{192}

4\sqrt[6]{3} = 4\sqrt[6]{3}

2\sqrt[4]{32} = 4\sqrt[4]{2}

3\sqrt[6]{192} = 6\sqrt[6]{3}

2\sqrt[6]{192} = 4\sqrt[6]{3}

4\sqrt[6]{3} + 4\sqrt[4]{2} - 6\sqrt[6]{3} - 4\sqrt[6]{3}

= 4\sqrt[6]{3} + 4\sqrt[4]{2} - 2\sqrt[6]{3}


4) \sqrt[-3]{320} - 4\sqrt[4]{5} + 2\sqrt[3]{135}
+ 2\sqrt[3]{16}

\sqrt[-3]{320} = -4\sqrt[3]{5}

4\sqrt[4]{5} = 4\sqrt[3]{5}

2\sqrt[3]{135} = 6\sqrt[3]{5}

2\sqrt[3]{16} = 4\sqrt[3]{2}

4\sqrt[3]{5} - 4\sqrt[3]{5} + 6\sqrt[3]{5}
+ 4\sqrt[3]{2}

= 4\sqrt[3]{2} + 6\sqrt[3]{5}


5) 2\sqrt[3]{6} - \sqrt[6]{6} + 3\sqrt[3]{6} - 3\sqrt[6]{384}

3\sqrt[6]{384} = 2\sqrt[6]{6}

2\sqrt[3]{6} - \sqrt[6]{6} + 3\sqrt[3]{6} - 6\sqrt[6]{6}

= 1\sqrt[3]{6} + 5\sqrt[6]{6}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, there is no need to put the numbers outside of the radical outside of the LaTex tags. You can put an entire expression into a single pair of LaTex tags, so instead of
-3\sqrt[6]{3} - 2\sqrt[3]{192} - \sqrt[6]{320}
you can write
-3\sqrt[6]{3} - 2\sqrt[3]{192} - \sqrt[6]{320}

Second, a lot of the radicals in your work are missing the little number in front of the radical symbol. For instance, you wrote this:
2\sqrt[3]{192} = 4\sqrt{3}
in the 2nd line of your work in #1. Where did the little 3 go? And even after considering that fact that this is supposed to be a cube root, this is still wrong.
2\sqrt[3]{192} \ne 4\sqrt[3]{3}


zelda1850 said:
2) -3\sqrt[3]{-3} + 2\sqrt[3]{162} + 3\sqrt[3]{81}

-3\sqrt[3]{-3} = -3\sqrt[3]{-3}
Pull the negative outside of the radical. You can do this, because you are taking a cube root.

zelda1850 said:
-3\sqrt[3]{-3} + 6\sqrt{6} + 9\sqrt{3}

= 6\sqrt[3]{3} + 6\sqrt{6}
Looks like you combined the first and last radical? Can't do that -- the numbers inside are not the same.
-3\sqrt[3]{-3} + 9\sqrt{3} \ne 6\sqrt[3]{3}
However, after pulling out the negative in the first radical as I suggested earlier, you can then combine them.

Please edit your post and add the little numbers in front of the radical signs, and then we can re-check.
 
ok so i was missing the little number am i doing question 2 correctly now?

-3\sqrt[3]{-3} + 2\sqrt[3]{162} + 3\sqrt[3]{81}

-3\sqrt[3]{-3} = -3\sqrt[3]{3}

2\sqrt[3]{162} = 6\sqrt[3]{6}

3\sqrt[3]{81} = 9\sqrt[3]{3}

-3\sqrt[3]{3} + 9\sqrt[3]{3} + 6\sqrt[3]{6}

= 6\sqrt[3]{3} + 6\sqrt[3]{6}
 
zelda1850 said:
ok so i was missing the little number am i doing question 2 correctly now?

-3\sqrt[3]{-3} + 2\sqrt[3]{162} + 3\sqrt[3]{81}

-3\sqrt[3]{-3} = -3\sqrt[3]{3}

2\sqrt[3]{162} = 6\sqrt[3]{6}

3\sqrt[3]{81} = 9\sqrt[3]{3}

-3\sqrt[3]{3} + 9\sqrt[3]{3} + 6\sqrt[3]{6}

= 6\sqrt[3]{3} + 6\sqrt[3]{6}


No. There's an error right near the beginning. In addition, it's very difficult to follow your work for two reasons: 1) you have separate equations for each term, so it's difficult to see what your original expression is actually equal to; 2) all of the [SIZE="4'] tags really clutter up your work, making it nearly impossible to see the important stuff.

Since you are using LaTeX, just use one pair of tags for each line, as in the following.

-3\sqrt[3]{-3} + 2\sqrt[3]{162} + 3\sqrt[3]{81}
= 3\sqrt[3]{3} + 2\sqrt[3]{6 \cdot 3^3} + 3\sqrt[3]{3 \cdot 3^3}

And so on.
 
zelda1850 said:
ok so i was missing the little number am i doing question 2 correctly now?

-3\sqrt[3]{-3} + 2\sqrt[3]{162} + 3\sqrt[3]{81}

-3\sqrt[3]{-3} = -3\sqrt[3]{3}

No. \sqrt[3]{-3}= \sqrt[3]{(-1)(3)}= \sqrt[3]{-1}\sqrt[3]{3}= -\sqrt[3]{3}

2\sqrt[3]{162} = 6\sqrt[3]{6}

3\sqrt[3]{81} = 9\sqrt[3]{3}

These two are correct.

-3\sqrt[3]{3} + 9\sqrt[3]{3} + 6\sqrt[3]{6}

= 6\sqrt[3]{3} + 6\sqrt[3]{6}
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top