Simplifying a resistor network using pi-T (Y-delta) conversion

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying a resistor network using the ∏-T (Y-Δ) conversion method. Initial observations indicate that the resistors RA, RB, and RC are neither in series nor parallel, prompting the use of conversion for further simplification. The participant encounters difficulty with R5's configuration, suspecting it can be bypassed due to a low-resistance path. After applying the parallel resistor formula, the equivalent resistance is calculated to be approximately 69.35Ω. The conversation concludes with validation of the calculations and the approach taken.
JJBladester
Gold Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Reduce the resistor network to a single resistor. Go step-by-step and indicate the series or parallel combinations being reduced.

pi-t%2520conversion.jpg


Homework Equations



For series resistors: R_T=R_1+R_2+R_3+\cdot \cdot \cdot +R_N
For parallel resistors: R_T=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_1}+\frac{1}{R_2}+\frac{1}{R_3}+\cdot \cdot \cdot +\frac{1}{R_N}}

∏-T Conversion:
R_1=\frac{R_BR_C}{R_A+R_B+R_C}
R_2=\frac{R_AR_C}{R_A+R_B+R_C}
R_3=\frac{R_AR_B}{R_A+R_B+R_C}

The Attempt at a Solution



The first thing I noticed is that RA, RB, and RC are not in series and they're not in parallel. This led me to the ∏-T (Y-Δ) conversion. After the conversion, I was able to make further simplifications in steps (2) and (3).

In step (4), I get stuck because I don't know how to simplify the circuit given the way R5 is hooked up. Any pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My thinking, assuming I drew everything correctly, is that R5 gets bypassed because a practically resistance-free path exists (the wire on the left-leg of the triangle above R5).

Therefore the equivalent resistance would be:

Req=R3+R2||(R1+R4) = 10.57Ω + 58.92Ω ≈ 69.5Ω

Does this make sense?
 
Yes. You can also think of the wire as a 0-ohm resistor and use the parallel resistor formula.
 
I guess cable across Rc and R4
So mark all the points as zero voltage.
Now we have a parallel circuit of
1. Ra-150Ω
2. Series of Rb and parallel resistors of Rc and R4-129Ω

Equivalent resistance=69.35Ω
 
Last edited:
lewando said:
...you can also think of the wire as a 0-ohm resistor and use the parallel resistor formula.

This makes sense.

So, R_T=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\sim 0 \Omega }+\frac{1}{220\Omega }}\approx 0 \Omega

Thanks lewando.
 
  • Like
Likes Mateo Zuluaga
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K