MHB Simplify Triplet: Redefining An in Terms of B & C

  • Thread starter Thread starter chuck klasky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplifying
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an individual's exploration of the Pythagorean theorem and Fermat’s Last theorem, leading to a proposed equation for redefining An in terms of B and C. The user expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their math due to a lack of practice. They present a series of mathematical transformations and seek verification from others. Additionally, there is a suggestion to use LaTeX for better presentation of mathematical expressions, along with guidance on how to implement it. The conversation highlights both the mathematical inquiry and the importance of clear communication in mathematical discussions.
chuck klasky
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have been studying the Pythagorean theorem and Fermat’s Last theorem for fun and to brush up on my algebra.
I think I’ve come up with an equation for redefining An in terms of B and C. But my math is too rusty to verify if its correct.
I hope you look at it and see if there is a mistake somewhere. Thanks

C^n – B^n = A^n
C – B = Q so C/Q – B/Q = Q/Q =1.
__________________________________________
[C^n-B^n]/Q^n = C^n/Q^n – B^n/Q^n = (C/Q)^n- (B/Q)^n = (C/Q)^n – ((C-Q)/Q)^n
= (C/Q)^n – (C/Q – Q/Q)^n = (C/Q)^n – (C/Q -1)^n { C-B = Q }
= (C / C-B)^n – ( (C/ C-B) – 1)^n and so
[Cn-Bn]/(C-B)^n = (C / C-B)^n – ( (C/ C-B) – 1)^n and therefore
Cn-B^n = (C-B)^n [(C / C-B)^n – ( (C/ C-B) – 1)^n] = A^n
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Chuck!

I would highly recommend learning to typeset your work using $\LaTeX$...this makes the reading of math expressions much easier on the reader. We have tools present to aid users in the construction and previewing of their code as well. :D
 
Sure-thanks. How? Where is the lesson plan?
chuck
 
chuck klasky said:
Sure-thanks. How? Where is the lesson plan?
chuck

Hi Chuck,

If you take a look at our http://mathhelpboards.com/latex-help-discussion-26/ then you can find some basic info but for this problem I'll try to give you some specific hints. :)

You can put equations between $$...$$ tags, or click the sigma sign you see in the toolbar when you are writing something.

For exponents, all you have to do is write them as you are already doing.

a^b becomes $$a^b$$

For fractions you make them like this:

\frac{a}{b} becomes $$\frac{a}{b}$$

Does that give you a start?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top