Simplifying Laplace Transformations for Time Domain Response Analysis

In summary: So, to find c(t) we just invert C(s). C(s) is not a ramp function, but the input R(s) is. When you multiply them together for the output you get the final answer. That's the only way to have a unit ramp as the input.In summary, the time domain response of the given control system with a unit RAMP input can be found by first factoring the denominator of the Laplace equation and using partial fraction expansion. The inverse Laplace transform will be the sum of a delta distribution and an exponentially decaying sinusoid. The steady state value of the system output can be found using the final-value theorem or by using the time-domain solution. The input R(s
  • #1
Charlie_
3
0
I need the time domain response of this system as a unit RAMP input

C(s) = ((2s²) + 20s) / ((s²) + 4s + 20)

I get that the RAMP input is C(s) = A/s² G(s)

And now I think I need to simplify it so I can get it into a form that's on the Laplace Transformation table but this is what I'm having trouble with, I've tried manipulating it, but the 2s² on the top seems to be causing me an issue. The exponentially decaying
cosine wave on the table seems to look the closest after manipulation, but when I have sketched it out, it doesn't cut the y-axis at 1.

I think it's my manipulation that's the problem. Any ideas? Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The 2s2 in the numerator can be dealt with easily enough:

[tex]\frac{2s^2+20s}{s^2+4s+20}=\frac{2(s^2+4s+20)+12s-40}{s^2+4s+20}=2 + 4\frac{3s-10}{s^2+4s+20}[/tex]

The inverse Laplace transform will then be the sum of a delta distribution and an exponentially decaying sinusoid. Why were you expecting a ramp function?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
The question said it was a unit RAMP input, sorry, I forgot to put that
 
  • #4
Charlie_ said:
The question said it was a unit RAMP input, sorry, I forgot to put that

Can you post the entire question verbatim (word for word), because the inverse Laplace transform of the given [itex]C(s)[/itex] is not a unit RAMP input
 
  • #5
A control system is described by the Laplace equation

C(s) = ((2s²) + 20s) / ((s²) + 4s + 20) R(s)

where R(s) is the input and C(s) is the output. A unit RAMP input is applied to the system.

a) Establish the time domain response of the system c(t).

b) What is the steady state value of the system output.

I've worked out the time domain response to be L^-1 (F)(s) = 1 - (e^-2t) * cos4t

Is this correct and how do you start to find the steady state value?
 
  • #6
Charlie_ said:
A control system is described by the Laplace equation

C(s)/R(s) = (2s² + 20s) / (s² + 4s + 20)
where R(s) is the input and C(s) is the output. A unit RAMP input is applied to the system.

a) Establish the time domain response of the system c(t).

b) What is the steady state value of the system output.

I've worked out the time domain response to be L^-1 (F)(s) = 1 - (e^-2t) * cos4t

Is this correct and how do you start to find the steady state value?

a) What was your C(s)? Then factor the denominator so part of it is of the form (s+s1)(s+s2). You'll be dealing with a complex-conjugate pole pair. The inveresion to the time domain is still of the form 1/(s+a) → e-at after you used partial-fraction expansion on the denominator.

b) Remember the final-value theorem? Steady-state value means the value of the output at t = ∞. Or, use your time-domain answer. Get the same either way ...

P.S. looks like your answer is correct but I haven't worked it out in detail. Your pole pair is right and so is the final value in the time domain using your answer.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Charlie_ said:
A control system is described by the Laplace equation

C(s) = ((2s²) + 20s) / ((s²) + 4s + 20) R(s)

where R(s) is the input and C(s) is the output. A unit RAMP input is applied to the system.

That makes sense now. C(s) is the output, so there is no reason to expect it to be the Laplace transform of a unit ramp function.

I've worked out the time domain response to be L^-1 (F)(s) = 1 - (e^-2t) * cos4t

That doesn't look correct (I get [itex]\mathcal{L}^{-1} \left[ C(s) \right] = 2\delta(t) + \left( 12 \cos(4t) - 4 \sin(4t) \right)e^{-2t}u(t)[/itex]), perhaps you should show your steps so we can see where you are going wrong.
 
  • #8
gabbagabbahey said:
That makes sense now. C(s) is the output, so there is no reason to expect it to be the Laplace transform of a unit ramp function.



That doesn't look correct (I get [itex]\mathcal{L}^{-1} \left[ C(s) \right] = 2\delta(t) + \left( 12 \cos(4t) - 4 \sin(4t) \right)e^{-2t}u(t)[/itex]), perhaps you should show your steps so we can see where you are going wrong.

His R(s) is a ramp. You need to include that fact in obtaining L-1{C(s)}. When you do you get his answer, or close to it (I'm still too lazy to perform the entire inversion).
 
Last edited:
  • #9
rude man said:
His R(s) is a ramp. You need to include that fact in obtaining L-1{C(s)}. When you do you get his answer, or close to it (I'm still too lazy to perform the entire inversion).

I'm not sure what you mean here. Maybe this is just some weird engineering terminology I'm unfamiliar with (I'm not an engineer), so correct me if I'm wrong here: when the problem says "Establish the time domain response of the system c(t)", do you not just compute the inverse Laplace transform of C(s)? Why and how do I need to include the input R(s) in the calculation?
 
  • #10
gabbagabbahey said:
I'm not sure what you mean here. Maybe this is just some weird engineering terminology I'm unfamiliar with (I'm not an engineer), so correct me if I'm wrong here: when the problem says "Establish the time domain response of the system c(t)", do you not just compute the inverse Laplace transform of C(s)? Why and how do I need to include the input R(s) in the calculation?

Because his system has an input R(s), transfer function H(s), and corresponding output
C(s). The formalism is C(s) = R(s)H(s). He was given H(s) = (2s2 + 20s)/(s2 + 4s + 20) and a unit ramp in the Laplace domain is R(s) = 1/s2. So you need to multiply what you deemed to be C(s), which is actually H(s), by 1/s2 before performing the inversion into the time domain.
 
  • #11
Gabba, I might add that what you did was find the impulse response to his system. I.e. R(s) = δ(t), then the output would be as you derived (presumably, I'm too lazy to work the details).
 
  • #12
rude man said:
Because his system has an input R(s), transfer function H(s), and corresponding output
C(s). The formalism is C(s) = R(s)H(s). He was given H(s) = (2s2 + 20s)/(s2 + 4s + 20)

Okay, looking more closely at post #5, I now see the R(s) in his equation for C(s) (which wasn't in his first post).
 
  • #13
gabbagabbahey said:
Okay, looking more closely at post #5, I now see the R(s) in his equation for C(s) (which wasn't in his first post).

Yes, ands I might add that I should have said L{δ(t)} = transform of the impulse input δ(t) = 1.
 

Related to Simplifying Laplace Transformations for Time Domain Response Analysis

1. What are Laplace Transformations?

Laplace Transformations are a mathematical tool used to convert functions between the time domain and the frequency domain. They are often used in engineering and physics to solve differential equations and analyze systems.

2. How do Laplace Transformations work?

Laplace Transformations involve integrating a function with respect to time, multiplied by an exponential term. This process essentially "transforms" the function from the time domain to the frequency domain, where it can be more easily analyzed using algebraic methods.

3. What is the significance of Laplace Transformations?

Laplace Transformations have several important applications in science and engineering. They can be used to solve differential equations, analyze systems and their stability, and determine the frequency response of a system. They are also used in signal processing and control systems.

4. What is the difference between a one-sided and two-sided Laplace Transformation?

A one-sided Laplace Transformation is used when the function being transformed is only defined for positive values of time. This is often the case in real-world applications. A two-sided Laplace Transformation, on the other hand, is used when the function is defined for both positive and negative values of time.

5. Are there any limitations to using Laplace Transformations?

While Laplace Transformations are a powerful tool, they do have some limitations. They may not be applicable to functions that have discontinuities or singularities, and they may not always converge for certain types of functions. In addition, they can be challenging to calculate for complex functions.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
597
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
17
Views
874
Back
Top