Simplifying the Euler-Lagrange Equation for Explicitly Independent Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter roeb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler-lagrange
roeb
Messages
98
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



If the integrand f(y, y', x) does not depend explicitly on x, that is, f = f(y, y') then
\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}y' + \frac{ \partial f } {\partial y' } y''Use the Euler-Lagrange equation to replace \partial f / \partial y on the right and hence show that \frac{df}{dx} = \frac{d}{dx} ( y' \frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} )

Homework Equations



\frac{\partial f }{\partial y} = \frac{d}{dx} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}

The Attempt at a Solution



By substituting in for df/df, I get an extra term that I can't seem to make go away.

\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{d}{dx} y' \frac{ \partial f }{\partial y'} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} y''

I can't seem to get rid of that extra term, it seems like it should be straight forward but...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe it helps if you work backwards... what is
<br /> \frac{df}{dx} = \frac{d}{dx} ( y&#039; \frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} )
?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top