Simultaneity between events in reference frames

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of simultaneity between events in different reference frames, particularly when they are in motion relative to each other. It confirms that if two events are simultaneous in one frame (S'), they will not be simultaneous in another frame (S) moving with velocity v, leading to a time difference expressed by the equation Δt = Dv/(c² - v²). The conversation also clarifies the implications of length contraction and how time intervals transform between frames using the Lorentz transformation. The confusion arises from interpreting time intervals based on synchronized clocks in different frames, with distinctions made between proper time and observed time. Ultimately, the participants affirm their understanding of the simultaneity issue and its mathematical representation.
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
29,403
Reaction score
21,096
Hi,

I've been trying to understand the (lack of) simultaneity between events in reference frames moving wrt each other. I'd be grateful if someone could confirm that I've got things right:

If two events are simultaneous in one reference frame (S'), then they will not be simultaneous in a reference frame (S) moving with velocity v relative to S' if the events are separated by any distance (D' or D) in the direction of motion. In which case, an observer in S will observe a time difference of:

\Delta t = \frac{Dv}{(c^2 - v^2)} (*)

And, if two events are separated by distance D' and time t' in S', then, as observed in S, they are separated by time:

\Delta t = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}(t' \pm \frac{D'v}{c^2})

(*) The book I'm reading expressed this equation in terms of an observer in S reading the times off clocks synchronised in S' and getting:

\Delta t = \frac{D'v}{c^2}

Which seems to me an odd way to express things and I think this confused me somewhat. Hopefully, I've now understood this simultaneity issue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PeroK said:
... And, if two events are separated by distance D' and time t' in S', then, as observed in S, they are separated by time:

\Delta t = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}(t' \pm \frac{D'v}{c^2})

(*) The book I'm reading expressed this equation in terms of an observer in S reading the times off clocks synchronised in S' and getting:

\Delta t = \frac{D'v}{c^2}

Which seems to me an odd way to express things and I think this confused me somewhat. Hopefully, I've now understood this simultaneity issue?

It is easier to start in reference frame S in which the rod of proper length ##D'## is moving with relative velocity v. We know that due to Length contraction the length of the rod in S is ##D =D'/\gamma##. Now we boost to S' (the frame in which the rod is at rest) and from the Lorentz transform the time interval is:

##\Delta t' = \gamma(\Delta t - D v /c^2) = \gamma(\Delta t - (D'/\gamma) v /c^2) ##

When measuring the length in S the measurements of the ends of the rod are made simultaneously so ##\Delta t = 0## and the above expression reduces to:

##\Delta t' = \gamma( - (D'/\gamma) v /c^2) = -D' v/c^2##

which is basically the expression in your textbook, other than they have ##\Delta t## rather than ##\Delta t'##. This is the amount the clock at the front of the rod is behind the clock at the rear of rod when viewed simultaneously in S. Note that I am using ##\Delta t'##which is the proper time shown by the clocks at rest with the rod.

It is a little confusing because we are talking about the difference between two clock readings as seen in S when those clocks are not at rest in S. Note that you said
(*) The book I'm reading expressed this equation in terms of an observer in S reading the times off clocks synchronised in S'
If an observer in S reads the times off clocks at rest in his reference frame, then the time interval is ##\Delta t## but if he is reading the times off clocks synchronised in S' and at rest in S' then the time interval is ##\Delta t'##.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I've definitely got it now.
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
788
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K