Maximizing Single Slit Diffraction: Solving for the Largest Width Without Minima

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Single slit Slit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the largest slit width in single slit diffraction that avoids minima in the diffraction pattern. It is established that when the slit width is smaller than the wavelength, no minima occur, and the question arises about the scenario when the slit width equals the wavelength. The user calculates using a slit width equal to the wavelength (633 nm) and finds that it leads to an angular position of 90 degrees for the first minimum, which is deemed impossible. The conclusion drawn is that the largest slit width without minima must be less than the wavelength of 633 nm. Thus, the maximum slit width that avoids diffraction minima is determined to be 633 nm or less.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Light from a helium neon laser with wavelength 633nm is incident on a single slit. What is the largest slit width for which there are no minima in the diffraction pattern?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For single slit diffraction, asin(theta)=p*lambda, where a= slit width, and p= 1,2,3...


So I know that when the slit width is smaller than the wavelength, no minima occur, but ?
what about when it is equal?

I'll try out some numbers: say the slit width is 6.33e-7 m, the same as the wavelength. Then I will find the angular position of the first minimum:

(6.33e-7)sin(theta)=(1)(6.33e-7)t
theta has to be equal to 90 degrees, which I don't think can be possible. So the wavelength has to be less than 633 nm.

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think that when the slit width is equal to the wavelength, then the light spreads to fill the region behind the opening. Therefore, I think that the largest the wavelength can be is 633 nm.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top