Singlet and Triplet Terms misunderstanding

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eats Dirt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Singlet Terms
Eats Dirt
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I am a little unclear on why in atomic physics that the total orbital momentum terms have to be specifically singlet or triplet states, for example

G -Singlet
F -Triplet
D -Singlet
P -Triplet
S -Singlet

I think it has to do with the pauli exclusion principle but don't really understand the process.

If someone could walk me through why that would be great! (edit: 2 electron case)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is simply due to the fact that you are dealing with 2 electrons, i.e. two spin-1/2 particles. When you consider the two electrons system as a whole you are building a new Hilbert space out of the tensor product of the two Hilbert spaces of the single electrons. Let's focus on the spin only. What you are doing is building:
$$
|j,_z\rangle=|1/2,\pm1/2\rangle\otimes|1/2,\pm1/2\rangle,
$$
where J=S_1+S_2 is the total spin. Now, it turns out that, in Quantum Mechanics, when you compose two spin-1/2 states, the total angular momentum can be either J=0 (single) or J=1 (triplet). Most of the times the atomic interaction depends on the total spin of the system and so it turns out that it is determined by the fact that the system is in a single/triplet.

For example, if you have an interaction of the kind:
$$ H=\lambda \vec{S}_1\cdot\vec{S}_2,$$
where \lambda is coupling constant, then you can write:
$$
J^2=(S_1+S_2)^2=S_1^2+S_2^2+2S_1\cdot S_2 \Rightarrow S_1\cdot S_2=\frac{J^2-S_1^2-S_2^2}{2}=\frac{j(j+1)-3/2}{2}.
$$
Then if you are in a single case j=0 and the energy shift is given by \Delta E_{sing}=-(3/4)\lambda, while if you are in a triplet j=1 and \Delta E_{tripl}=+(1/4)\lambda.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Hi, thanks for the reply.

I still don't quite understand how this connects to the total level L values, for example why does the G state exclusively have a singlet

<br /> ^{2S+1}L_{J}<br />
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top