Can Singlet Spin Pairs Behave Like Bosons?

anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
11,326
Reaction score
8,750
I just studied about the QM of singlet spin pairs. I have additional questions. Neither Wikipedia, nor past threads on this forum seem to address the questions.

1) A pair of electrons forming a singlet pair A. Can the pair be split again into non-entangled electrons? If yes how; just hit it with a photon?

2) Suppose we have two singlet pairs A and B. Can they be brought together without obeying the Fermi exclusion principle?

3) Can we entangle pairs A and B into a quantum system with 4 electrons and 16 spin states?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Yes. Easiest is to measure the spin of one electron (along any axis).

2) The exclusion principle always holds.

3) Assuming we have a universal set of quantum gates with which to manipulate the spins, then we can put them into any state we like, such as the 4-particle GHZ state.
 
Thank you Avodyne. Regarding Pauli Exclusion, I was wondering if a singlet pair can behave like a boson, even though the electrons are fermions.
 
anorlunda said:
Thank you Avodyne. Regarding Pauli Exclusion, I was wondering if a singlet pair can behave like a boson, even though the electrons are fermions.
It can - superconductors or superfluidity of He3 work that way, for example. That does not violate the uncertainty principle - no two fermions have the same state.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top