Sintering A Device That Already Had Ohmic Contacts

  • Thread starter Thread starter CanIExplore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Device
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the effects of sintering on transistors that initially exhibited ohmic contacts. After performing electrical measurements, the user observed that while the IV curve shapes remained consistent, the current magnitudes increased after sintering, contrary to expectations of negligible effects on already ohmic contacts. The user speculates that sintering reduces contact resistance, which could explain the increase in current. However, they question why such an increase occurs if the contacts were already functioning well. The inquiry seeks clarification on the underlying physical phenomena that could account for this unexpected result.
CanIExplore
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Hello forum,

I am having a little trouble interpreting the data I got for a recent project in my fabrication lab. I created transistors of varying gate widths and lengths and am characterizing them by performing various electrical measurements. Initially, after completing my device, the IV curves for my contacts were completely ohmic. The transistors, diodes, and capacitors were working as expected. My TA thought it would be a good idea for me to go ahead and sinter anyway after I completed my electrical measurements to see what the effects would be on my transistors. It turns out, that the shapes for the IV curves were maintained, but the magnitude of the currents as functions of the drain voltage decreased after sintering. I have no idea how to explain this.

Please see the attached figures for my data. The 100μm x 5μm transistor shows a lot of leakage which I explained was due to the fact that during the diffusion step in creating the source and drain, I also carried out a drive in step. This drive in step would also cause a spreading in the diffusion profile of the doped regions of the source and drain. The gate length in this case may be much smaller than 5μm. The 400μm x 20μm shows a typical IV curve for a working transistor for gate voltages of 2V, 6V, and 10V before and after sintering.
 

Attachments

  • Slide6.JPG
    Slide6.JPG
    45.6 KB · Views: 468
  • Slide7.JPG
    Slide7.JPG
    45.4 KB · Views: 495
Engineering news on Phys.org
CanIExplore said:
... the shapes for the IV curves were maintained, but the magnitude of the currents as functions of the drain voltage decreased after sintering.
Wouldn't this be expected since the contacts would be "less ohmic" due to the sintering?
 
I'm such a clutz! I meant to say that the current magnitudes INCREASE as a function of drain voltage after sintering. This is apparent from the IV curves provided. In that case, I guess it makes sense because sintering is supposed to create better ohmic contacts. Although if the contacts were already ohmic, I would expect the sintering effect to be negligible on these IV curves. Sintering serves to create better ohmic contacts by decreasing the contact resistance. But if these contacts were already ohmic, in otherwords they already had really low contact resistance, why should I see the current almost double here in these IV curves after sintering? Can someone shed some light on what the physical phenomenon behind this is?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top