Sintering A Device That Already Had Ohmic Contacts

  • Thread starter Thread starter CanIExplore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Device
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the effects of sintering on transistors that initially exhibited ohmic contacts. After performing electrical measurements, the user observed that while the IV curve shapes remained consistent, the current magnitudes increased after sintering, contrary to expectations of negligible effects on already ohmic contacts. The user speculates that sintering reduces contact resistance, which could explain the increase in current. However, they question why such an increase occurs if the contacts were already functioning well. The inquiry seeks clarification on the underlying physical phenomena that could account for this unexpected result.
CanIExplore
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Hello forum,

I am having a little trouble interpreting the data I got for a recent project in my fabrication lab. I created transistors of varying gate widths and lengths and am characterizing them by performing various electrical measurements. Initially, after completing my device, the IV curves for my contacts were completely ohmic. The transistors, diodes, and capacitors were working as expected. My TA thought it would be a good idea for me to go ahead and sinter anyway after I completed my electrical measurements to see what the effects would be on my transistors. It turns out, that the shapes for the IV curves were maintained, but the magnitude of the currents as functions of the drain voltage decreased after sintering. I have no idea how to explain this.

Please see the attached figures for my data. The 100μm x 5μm transistor shows a lot of leakage which I explained was due to the fact that during the diffusion step in creating the source and drain, I also carried out a drive in step. This drive in step would also cause a spreading in the diffusion profile of the doped regions of the source and drain. The gate length in this case may be much smaller than 5μm. The 400μm x 20μm shows a typical IV curve for a working transistor for gate voltages of 2V, 6V, and 10V before and after sintering.
 

Attachments

  • Slide6.JPG
    Slide6.JPG
    45.6 KB · Views: 470
  • Slide7.JPG
    Slide7.JPG
    45.4 KB · Views: 499
Engineering news on Phys.org
CanIExplore said:
... the shapes for the IV curves were maintained, but the magnitude of the currents as functions of the drain voltage decreased after sintering.
Wouldn't this be expected since the contacts would be "less ohmic" due to the sintering?
 
I'm such a clutz! I meant to say that the current magnitudes INCREASE as a function of drain voltage after sintering. This is apparent from the IV curves provided. In that case, I guess it makes sense because sintering is supposed to create better ohmic contacts. Although if the contacts were already ohmic, I would expect the sintering effect to be negligible on these IV curves. Sintering serves to create better ohmic contacts by decreasing the contact resistance. But if these contacts were already ohmic, in otherwords they already had really low contact resistance, why should I see the current almost double here in these IV curves after sintering? Can someone shed some light on what the physical phenomenon behind this is?
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top