Sinusoids as Phasors, Complex Exp, I&Q and Polar form

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between phasors, complex exponentials, and their representations in polar and Cartesian forms. It highlights the confusion stemming from the different forms of expressing A cos(ωt + Φ) and how they relate to Cartesian coordinates. The conversation addresses whether constants in the polar representation can be equated to varying coefficients in the Cartesian form, particularly when considering the phase's impact on these coefficients. Additionally, it emphasizes that while the magnitudes of the left and right sides of the equations can match under certain conditions, the phase information may be lost, raising questions about how to maintain this phase with varying coefficients. The complexities of these transformations underscore the importance of understanding the underlying mathematical principles.
Natalie Johnson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am going around in circles, excuse the pun, with phasors, complex exponentials, I&Q and polar form...

1. A cos (ωt+Φ) = Acos(Φ) cos(ωt) - Asin(Φ)sin(ωt)
Right hand side is polar form ... left hand side is in cartesian (rectangular) form via a trignometric identity?

2. But then sometimes I read...
A cos (ωt+Φ) in polar form has corresponding cartesian form of Bcos(ωt)+Csin(ωt), which is fine to understand because this cartesian form gives X and Y coordinates on a cartesian coordinate axes of a vector in that axes.

3. But point 1 and 2 are different, how can Acos (ωt+Φ) in polar represent Bcos(ωt)+Csin(ωt) in cartesian but also be equal to Acos(Φ) cos(ωt) - Asin(Φ)sin(ωt) via a trignometric identity ---> Is it because Acos(Φ) and Asin(Φ) are constants and therefore also B and C? Might be obvious but I need to ask for my own sanity of seeing so much different ways its written.

What about if B and C are not constants due to the phase changing with time Φ(t)?

I am further purplexed by notation used for complex sinusoids.

3. Acos (ωt+Φ) can be represented as the real part of Aei(ωt+Φ)= Acos(ωt+Φ) + iAsin(ωt+Φ)
but from point 1, the right hand side of this equation can be then re-written with the trigometric identity in point 1, expanding it into 4 terms which removes the phase from the argument and giving constants, like in point 3. So why cannot it not be written without the Φ in the argument on the right hand side and use different constants
Aei(ωt+Φ)=Bcos(ωt)+iCsin(ωt)
 
Science news on Phys.org
Start with ##e^{\pm i\omega t}=\cos\omega t\pm i\sin\omega t##,
Now,
$$\begin{align}
e^{i (\omega t+\phi)}& =e^{i\omega t}e^{i\phi}=(\cos\omega t+i\sin\omega t)(\cos\phi +i\sin\phi)\nonumber \\
& =(\cos\omega t~cos\phi-\sin\omega t~sin\phi)+i(\sin\omega t~\cos\phi+\cos\omega t~sin\phi)\nonumber
\end{align}$$Equating real and imaginary parts, gives you two trig identities
$$\cos(\omega t+\phi)=\cos\omega t~cos\phi-\sin\omega t~sin\phi~;~~~\sin(\omega t+\phi)=\sin\omega t~\cos\phi+\cos\omega t~sin\phi$$
You can easily show that $$\cos\omega t= \frac{e^{i\omega t}+e^{-i\omega t}}{2}~;~~~\sin\omega t= \frac{e^{i\omega t}-e^{-i\omega t}}{2i}=-i\frac{e^{i\omega t}-e^{-i\omega t}}{2}.$$
Then,
$$
\begin{align}
A \cos\omega t +B\sin \omega t &=A\frac{e^{i\omega t}+e^{-i\omega t}}{2}-iB\frac{e^{i\omega t}-e^{-i\omega t}}{2}\nonumber \\
& = \frac{(A-iB)e^{i\omega t}}{2} +\frac{(A+iB)e^{-i\omega t}}{2}\nonumber
\end{align}$$
Note that the last expression is real because it is the sum of a number plus its complex conjugate. You can write the complex coefficient in polar form, ##A-iB = re^{i\phi},~r=\sqrt{A^2+B^2}##. In that case,
$$
\begin{align}
A \cos\omega t +B\sin \omega t &= \frac{re^{i(\omega t +\phi)}}{2} +\frac{re^{-i(\omega t +\phi)}}{2}\nonumber\\
& =\sqrt{A^2+B^2}\cos(\omega t+\phi)\nonumber
\end{align}.$$
Note: In the above expression ##\phi = \arctan(B/A)##.
I hope this clarifies things for you and convinces you that the complex exponential plays a pivotal role in trigonometric transformations.
 
Natalie Johnson said:
So why cannot it not be written without the Φ in the argument on the right hand side and use different constants
Aei(ωt+Φ)=Bcos(ωt)+iCsin(ωt)
Can that be right? I would have thought that the magnitude of the left hand side is constant but the magnitude of the right hand side is not (it's an ellipse) unless B=C.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Can that be right? I would have thought that the magnitude of the left hand side is constant but the magnitude of the right hand side is not (it's an ellipse) unless B=C.
I don't think that ##B=C## will do it, but ##A=\sqrt{B^2+C^2}## will.
Suppose ##z = Ae^{i \omega t}=B\cos(\omega t)+iC\sin(\omega t)##, where ##A##, ##B## and ##C## are assumed real.
Then
##|z|^2=(Ae^{i \omega t})(Ae^{-i \omega t})=A^2##
But also
##|z|^2=[B\cos(\omega t)+iC\sin(\omega t)][B\cos(\omega t)-iC\sin(\omega t)]=B^2+C^2##
The two expressions will match if ##A^2=B^2+C^2## as also shown in post #2.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
But the phase has been lost. How can varying B and C coefficients achieve an arbitrary phase for the resultant?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top