Situation diagram and free body diagram

AI Thread Summary
A situation diagram represents the overall context of a physics problem, while a free body diagram focuses specifically on the forces acting on a single object, excluding the forces it exerts. In a free body diagram, the chosen object is depicted with all external forces acting on it, such as gravity and tension from supporting threads, but not the forces it exerts on other objects. Understanding the distinction is crucial for correctly analyzing physical scenarios. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in differentiating these two types of diagrams in physics. Proper use of both diagrams aids in solving complex problems effectively.
Googl
Messages
111
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

What is the difference between a situation diagram and free body diagram? I understand what a free body diagram is.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand what a "situation diagram" is. Perhaps it's any kind of diagram of a physics problem.

For a free body diagram, you pick some object to be the "free body" and then you draw all the forces acting upon the body and do not draw the forces exerted by the body itself. For example if the "free body" is bar is suspended at its ends by threads, you draw the force of gravity on the bar and the force of each thread on the bar. But you don't draw the forces that the body exerts on the threads or the forces that the other ends of the threads exert on the ceiling or whatever is holding them.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top