MHB Sizes of kernels of homomorphisms

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalish1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homomorphisms
kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I have a problem that I have been stuck on for two hours. I would like to check if I have made any progress or I am just going in circles.

**Problem: Let $\alpha:G \rightarrow H, \beta:H \rightarrow K$ be group homomorphisms. Which is larger, $\ker(\beta\alpha)$ or $\ker(\alpha)$?**

**My work:** $\ker(\alpha)<G, \ker(\beta\alpha)<G, |G|=|\ker\alpha|*|im\alpha|=|\ker\beta|*|im\beta|$

$|G|=|\ker\alpha|[G:\ker\alpha]=|\ker\beta|[G:\ker\beta]$

$|im\alpha|$ divides $|G|$ and $|H|$

$|im\beta\alpha|$ divides $|G|$ and $|K|$

$|ker(\beta\alpha)|=\frac{|G|}{|im(\beta\alpha)|}, |ker(\alpha)|=\frac{|G|}{|im(\alpha)|}$

$\frac{|\ker(\beta\alpha)|}{|\ker\alpha|} \leq \frac{|H|}{|im(\beta\alpha)|}$

With similar analysis, I get $|\ker(\beta\alpha)| \geq \frac{|G|}{|K|}$ and $|\ker(\alpha)| \geq \frac{|G|}{|H|}$.

This seems like too much work with zero output.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If $g \in \text{ker}(\alpha)$ then it is immediate that:

$\beta\alpha(g) = \beta(e_H) = e_K$, so that:

$g \in \text{ker}(\beta\alpha)$.

Hence it is obvious that all of $\text{ker}(\alpha)$ is contained within $\text{ker}(\beta\alpha)$, so the latter must be the larger set (it may the same set if $\beta$ is an isomorphism).
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top