MHB Sizes of kernels of homomorphisms

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalish1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homomorphisms
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the sizes of the kernels of two group homomorphisms, specifically whether $\ker(\beta\alpha)$ is larger than $\ker(\alpha)$. The user analyzes the relationships between the orders of the groups and their images, concluding that $\ker(\alpha)$ is contained within $\ker(\beta\alpha)$. This leads to the conclusion that $\ker(\beta\alpha)$ must be the larger set, although it could be equal if $\beta$ is an isomorphism. The user expresses frustration over the complexity of the problem despite reaching this conclusion. The analysis ultimately confirms that $\ker(\beta\alpha)$ encompasses $\ker(\alpha)$.
kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I have a problem that I have been stuck on for two hours. I would like to check if I have made any progress or I am just going in circles.

**Problem: Let $\alpha:G \rightarrow H, \beta:H \rightarrow K$ be group homomorphisms. Which is larger, $\ker(\beta\alpha)$ or $\ker(\alpha)$?**

**My work:** $\ker(\alpha)<G, \ker(\beta\alpha)<G, |G|=|\ker\alpha|*|im\alpha|=|\ker\beta|*|im\beta|$

$|G|=|\ker\alpha|[G:\ker\alpha]=|\ker\beta|[G:\ker\beta]$

$|im\alpha|$ divides $|G|$ and $|H|$

$|im\beta\alpha|$ divides $|G|$ and $|K|$

$|ker(\beta\alpha)|=\frac{|G|}{|im(\beta\alpha)|}, |ker(\alpha)|=\frac{|G|}{|im(\alpha)|}$

$\frac{|\ker(\beta\alpha)|}{|\ker\alpha|} \leq \frac{|H|}{|im(\beta\alpha)|}$

With similar analysis, I get $|\ker(\beta\alpha)| \geq \frac{|G|}{|K|}$ and $|\ker(\alpha)| \geq \frac{|G|}{|H|}$.

This seems like too much work with zero output.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If $g \in \text{ker}(\alpha)$ then it is immediate that:

$\beta\alpha(g) = \beta(e_H) = e_K$, so that:

$g \in \text{ker}(\beta\alpha)$.

Hence it is obvious that all of $\text{ker}(\alpha)$ is contained within $\text{ker}(\beta\alpha)$, so the latter must be the larger set (it may the same set if $\beta$ is an isomorphism).
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K