Sketching the graph of a function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Setareh7796
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Graph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding sketching a function defined over a specific interval, from -l to +l, and the requirement to extend the graph beyond this range. Participants clarify that the function is periodic with a period of 2l, meaning f(x) should equal f(x + 2l). There is a focus on correcting the notation used in the function, specifically distinguishing between using lowercase 'l' and the proper Unicode character for clarity. LaTeX is suggested as a better formatting option for presenting mathematical expressions. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting the problem statement and using correct notation for effective communication in mathematics.
Setareh7796
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Sketch f(x) in the range -2l<x<2l
Relevant Equations
The equation is in the picture attached
I have no idea why my sketch is wrong.
 

Attachments

  • Function.jpg
    Function.jpg
    35.9 KB · Views: 348
Physics news on Phys.org
But your function looks to be only defined over -l to +l -- why are you asked to extend it outside of that definition? Is there more to the question? Is that really how the problem is stated in the book?
 
berkeman said:
But your function looks to be only defined over -l to +l -- why are you asked to extend it outside of that definition? Is there more to the question? Is that really how the problem is stated in the book?

I have attached the full question as stated in the problem sheet. I am just stuck in the sketching part.
 

Attachments

  • question.jpg
    question.jpg
    28.6 KB · Views: 305
Setareh7796 said:
I have attached the full question as stated in the problem sheet.
Ah, yes. You left out the "and" part... :smile:

So the period of the waveform is 2l, right? So f(x) should equal f(2l), not f(3l/2)...
 
berkeman said:
So f(x) should equal f(2l), not f(3l/2)...
According to the belated problem statement, f(x) = f(x + 2l).
 
Mark44 said:
According to the belated problem statement, f(x) = f(x + 2l).
Yeah, thanks Mark. I meant f(x) = f(x + 2l), not = f(x + 3l/2). Trying to type too fast I guess...
 
That " l ", lower case L, sure makes these expressions difficult to read. There is a Unicode character that will help, Unicode character U + 2113, which is rendered as ℓ .

f(x) = f(x + 2l) becomes f(x) = f(x + 2ℓ)

##\LaTeX##, can also give a good result. Its standard use of a serif font in italics for variables gives ##f(x) = f(x + 2l) ##.

But the script lowercase L can be displayed in ##\LaTeX##. Use "\ell" to get ##f(x) = f(x + 2\ell) ##.

Now I must say that "\ell" looks better written with ##\LaTeX## as \##ell##.
 
Back
Top