Setareh7796
- 9
- 0
berkeman said:But your function looks to be only defined over -l to +l -- why are you asked to extend it outside of that definition? Is there more to the question? Is that really how the problem is stated in the book?
According to the belated problem statement, f(x) = f(x + 2l).berkeman said:So f(x) should equal f(2l), not f(3l/2)...