Sketching the graph of a function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Setareh7796
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Graph
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on sketching the graph of a periodic function defined over the interval from -l to +l, with a period of 2l. Participants clarify that the correct expression for the function is f(x) = f(x + 2l) and emphasize the importance of accurately representing the variable 'l' using Unicode character U + 2113 or LaTeX formatting. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in interpreting mathematical notation and the necessity of adhering to the problem statement as provided in the source material.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of periodic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation and expressions
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for typesetting mathematical formulas
  • Basic skills in graph sketching techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of periodic functions and their graphical representations
  • Learn how to use LaTeX for typesetting complex mathematical expressions
  • Explore Unicode characters relevant to mathematical notation
  • Practice sketching graphs of functions with varying periods and intervals
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and mathematicians who are involved in graphing functions, particularly those dealing with periodic functions and mathematical notation.

Setareh7796
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Sketch f(x) in the range -2l<x<2l
Relevant Equations
The equation is in the picture attached
I have no idea why my sketch is wrong.
 

Attachments

  • Function.jpg
    Function.jpg
    35.9 KB · Views: 360
Physics news on Phys.org
But your function looks to be only defined over -l to +l -- why are you asked to extend it outside of that definition? Is there more to the question? Is that really how the problem is stated in the book?
 
berkeman said:
But your function looks to be only defined over -l to +l -- why are you asked to extend it outside of that definition? Is there more to the question? Is that really how the problem is stated in the book?

I have attached the full question as stated in the problem sheet. I am just stuck in the sketching part.
 

Attachments

  • question.jpg
    question.jpg
    28.6 KB · Views: 312
Setareh7796 said:
I have attached the full question as stated in the problem sheet.
Ah, yes. You left out the "and" part... :smile:

So the period of the waveform is 2l, right? So f(x) should equal f(2l), not f(3l/2)...
 
berkeman said:
So f(x) should equal f(2l), not f(3l/2)...
According to the belated problem statement, f(x) = f(x + 2l).
 
Mark44 said:
According to the belated problem statement, f(x) = f(x + 2l).
Yeah, thanks Mark. I meant f(x) = f(x + 2l), not = f(x + 3l/2). Trying to type too fast I guess...
 
That " l ", lower case L, sure makes these expressions difficult to read. There is a Unicode character that will help, Unicode character U + 2113, which is rendered as ℓ .

f(x) = f(x + 2l) becomes f(x) = f(x + 2ℓ)

##\LaTeX##, can also give a good result. Its standard use of a serif font in italics for variables gives ##f(x) = f(x + 2l) ##.

But the script lowercase L can be displayed in ##\LaTeX##. Use "\ell" to get ##f(x) = f(x + 2\ell) ##.

Now I must say that "\ell" looks better written with ##\LaTeX## as \##ell##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K