Slab resting on two supports: Maximum weight added without tipping?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tjosan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Weight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum weight a slab can support without tipping when resting on two supports. Participants debate the correct approach to calculating moments and forces, with one suggesting that moments should be calculated rather than forces, leading to confusion over the use of symbols. There is acknowledgment of errors in calculations, particularly regarding the placement of weights and their distances from the supports. The conversation also touches on the implications of placing additional weight at different points on the slab and whether this affects the overall stability. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards using moment calculations to minimize errors in determining tipping points.
tjosan
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A slab is placed on two supports. At one edge, a weight is added. How large can the weight be before the slab tips over? The slab weighs 300 kg, and the density is constant. See image for attempted solution and a drawing of the slab.
Relevant Equations
F_1*d_1=F_2*d_2
Hi,

My attempted solution is in the image:

I choose the edge on the left side, but the solution should be similar on both sides (just substitute C for A).

(I missed to multiply by "g" in F_2.)

Is this the correct way of thinking? I'm not sure about the distance "D".
slabsupport.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

I can't follow what you do on the left side:
On the right side you calculate a moment (not a force, so the use of the symbol F is misleading) WB * g * B/2

If I work out your expression for F1 I get WA * g * A + W1 * g * A/2
and it should be the other way around...
 
  • Like
Likes tjosan
BvU said:
Hello,

I can't follow what you do on the left side:
On the right side you calculate a moment (not a force, so the use of the symbol F is misleading) WB * g * B/2

If I work out your expression for F1 I get WA * g * A + W1 * g * A/2
and it should be the other way around...
Thank you.

Yeah, made a mistake and wrote it as a force.

Are you saying it should be:
WA * g * A/2 + W1 * g * A ?

What I did on the left side, or what I tried to do, was to add the extra lever distance resulting from the weight W1, by calcuting the ratio of W1 to W1+WA and adding it to A/2 - if this makes any sense?
 
I suppose it makes sense but was processed erroneously.

Anyway, you should work with the sum of moments without having to fall back to shifting lever distances ! Much less error-prone :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes tjosan
Would it requie more or less weight if W1 was placed on the corner of the slab? Is it dependant on the width?
 
For the direction we did the analysis in it makes no difference. For a direction into the paper we have no information
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top